From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Add a new quotactl command to support 3 quota
	types in XFS
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 12:44:10 -0500
Message-ID: <20130821174410.GC7153@sgi.com>
References: <1375828029-26360-1-git-send-email-sekharan@us.ibm.com>
	<20130820222528.GG5262@sgi.com> <1377088082.2738.19.camel@menhir>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Abhijith Das <adas@redhat.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan@us.ibm.com>, xfs@oss.sgi.com
To: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
Return-path: <xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1377088082.2738.19.camel@menhir>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/options/xfs>,
	<mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs>
List-Post: <mailto:xfs@oss.sgi.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs>,
	<mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com
Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

Hi Steven,

On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 01:28:02PM +0100, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 17:25 -0500, Ben Myers wrote:
> > Hi Chandra,
> > 
> > On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 05:27:06PM -0500, Chandra Seetharaman wrote:
> > > XFS now supports simultaneous use of 3 quota types (user, group,
> > > and project).
> > > 
> > > In order to support this a new quotactl command is introduced
> > > in this patch series.
> > 
> > I've applied patches 1 and 2 at git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/xfs.git, master branch.
> > I think patch 3 should go through the gfs2 tree.
> > 
> > Steven, I think if you want to pull in patch 3 you'll also need patch 1.  Maybe
> > the easiest way is to cherry pick it from the xfs tree?  If you do we'll have a
> > trivial merge conflict.  Anyway, it's af30cb446dd5 if you want.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 	Ben
> 
> I think it would be better if all the patches went through the same tree
> to save issues with dependencies. I don't mind if you want to put the
> gfs2 patches in the xfs tree to keep everything in the same place. There
> are no current quota changes in the gfs2 tree, so there should not be a
> conflict due to that.

Ok, we'll take that route.  Thanks.

> Also, it would be good if Christoph's comments could be addressed too,

Agreed.

-Ben

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs