From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Theodore Ts'o Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] vfs: add a O_NOMTIME flag Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 10:47:19 -0400 Message-ID: <20150511144719.GA14088@thunk.org> References: <1430949612-21356-1-git-send-email-zab@redhat.com> <20150507002617.GJ4327@dastard> <20150507172053.GA659@lenny.home.zabbo.net> <20150508221325.GM4327@dastard> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Sage Weil , Dave Chinner , Zach Brown , Alexander Viro , Linux FS-devel Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux API Mailing List To: Trond Myklebust Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 07:13:24PM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote: > That makes it completely non-generic though. By putting this in the > VFS, you are giving applications a loaded gun that is pointed straight > at the application user's head. Let me re-ask the question that I asked last week (and was apparently ignored). Why not trying to use the lazytime feature instead of pointing a head straight at the application's --- and system administrators' --- heads? - Ted