From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH 30/51] writeback: implement and use inode_congested() Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2015 21:46:34 -0400 Message-ID: <20150702014634.GF26440@mtj.duckdns.org> References: <1432329245-5844-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <1432329245-5844-31-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <20150630152105.GP7252@quack.suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hch@infradead.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, vgoyal@redhat.com, lizefan@huawei.com, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, mhocko@suse.cz, clm@fb.com, fengguang.wu@intel.com, david@fromorbit.com, gthelen@google.com, khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru To: Jan Kara Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150630152105.GP7252@quack.suse.cz> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org Hello, On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 05:21:05PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > Hum, is there any point in supporting NULL inode with inode_congested()? > That would look more like a programming bug than anything... Otherwise the > patch looks good to me so you can add: Those are inherited from the existing usages and all for swapper space. I think we should have a dummy inode instead of scattering NULL mapping->host test all over the place but that's for another day. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org