From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <owner-linux-mm@kvack.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 10:38:28 +0100
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>, David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>,
	Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org,
	cluster-devel@redhat.com, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
	logfs@logfs.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-ntfs-dev@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9 v2] scope GFP_NOFS api
Message-ID: <20161222093828.GF6048@dhcp22.suse.cz>
References: <20161215140715.12732-1-mhocko@kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20161215140715.12732-1-mhocko@kernel.org>
Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>

Are there any objections to the approach and can we have this merged to
the mm tree?

Dave has expressed the patch2 should be dropped for now. I will do that
in a next submission but I do not want to resubmit until there is a
consensus on this.

What do other than xfs/ext4 developers think about this API. Can we find
a way to use it?
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>