From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:50354 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750787AbdAQH6R (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jan 2017 02:58:17 -0500 Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 08:57:03 +0100 From: Cyril Hrubis To: Jan Stancek Cc: mtk manpages , Miklos Szeredi , linux-fsdevel , viro , guaneryu@gmail.com, ltp@lists.linux.it, Linux API , Dave Chinner Subject: Re: utimensat EACCES vs. EPERM in 4.8+ Message-ID: <20170117075702.GB10417@rei.lan> References: <18a5b416-ad6a-e679-d993-af7ffa0dcc10@redhat.com> <280513509.810300.1484639500985.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <280513509.810300.1484639500985.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi! > > Jan, thanks for spotting this. > > Credit goes to Cyril. As for LTP-20170116 (released yesterday) we went > with current documented behavior - few failures are expected on 4.8+. Actually credit goes to SUSE QAM that caught the change on kernel update :-). -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz