From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from imap.thunk.org ([74.207.234.97]:46172 "EHLO imap.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752244AbeCPDCc (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Mar 2018 23:02:32 -0400 Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 22:59:28 -0400 From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Andiry Xu , "Darrick J. Wong" , Linux FS Devel , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" , Dan Williams , "Rudoff, Andy" , coughlan@redhat.com, Steven Swanson , Dave Chinner , Jan Kara , swhiteho@redhat.com, miklos@szeredi.hu, Jian Xu , Andiry Xu Subject: Re: [RFC v2 03/83] Add super.h. Message-ID: <20180316025928.GB2254@thunk.org> References: <1520705944-6723-1-git-send-email-jix024@eng.ucsd.edu> <1520705944-6723-4-git-send-email-jix024@eng.ucsd.edu> <20180315045401.GB4860@magnolia> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 09:38:29PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > You could also have a resolution of less than a nanosecond. Note > that today, the file time stamps generated by the kernel are in > jiffies resolution, so at best one millisecond. However, most modern > file systems go with the 64+32 bit timestamps because it's not all > that expensive. It actually depends on the architecture and the accuracy/granularity of the timekeeping hardware available to the system, but it's possible for the granularity of file time stamps to be up to one nanosecond. So you can get results like this: % stat unix_io.o File: unix_io.o Size: 55000 Blocks: 112 IO Block: 4096 regular file Device: fc01h/64513d Inode: 19931278 Links: 1 Access: (0644/-rw-r--r--) Uid: (15806/ tytso) Gid: (15806/ tytso) Access: 2018-03-15 18:09:21.679914182 -0400 Modify: 2018-03-15 18:09:21.639914089 -0400 Change: 2018-03-15 18:09:21.639914089 -0400 Cheers, - Ted