From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 11:55:08 +1000 From: Dave Chinner To: Jerome Glisse Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Weiner , Michal Hocko Subject: Re: [LSF/MM] schedule suggestion Message-ID: <20180419015508.GJ27893@dastard> References: <20180418211939.GD3476@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180418211939.GD3476@redhat.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 05:19:39PM -0400, Jerome Glisse wrote: > Just wanted to suggest to push HMM status down one slot in the > agenda to avoid having FS and MM first going into their own > room and then merging back for GUP and DAX, and re-splitting > after. More over HMM and NUMA talks will be good to have back > to back as they deal with same kind of thing mostly. So while we are talking about schedule suggestions, we see that there's lots of empty slots in the FS track. We (xfs guys) were just chatting on #xfs about whether we'd have time to have a "XFS devel meeting" at some point during LSF/MM as we are rarely in the same place at the same time. I'd like to propose that we compact the fs sessions so that we get a 3-slot session reserved for "Individual filesystem discussions" one afternoon. That way we've got time in the schedule for the all the ext4/btrfs/XFS/NFS/CIFS devs to get together with each other and talk about things of interest only to their own fileystems. That means we all don't have to find time outside the schedule to do this, and think this wold be time very well spent for most fs people at the conf.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com