From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.26.193]:55173 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751372AbeDZGLK (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Apr 2018 02:11:10 -0400 Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 08:11:08 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Moving unmaintained filesystems to staging Message-ID: <20180426061108.GB4977@amd> References: <20180425154602.GA8546@bombadil.infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jRHKVT23PllUwdXP" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180425154602.GA8546@bombadil.infradead.org> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --jRHKVT23PllUwdXP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed 2018-04-25 08:46:02, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > Recently ncpfs got moved to staging. Also recently, we had some fuzzer > developers report bugs in hfs, which they deem a security hole because > Ubuntu attempts to automount an inserted USB device as hfs. We promise "no-regressions" for code in main repository, no such promise for staging. We have quite a lot of code without maintainer. Moving code to staging means it will get broken -- staging was not designed for this. I believe moving anything there is bad idea. Staging is for ugly code, not for code that needs new maintainter. Pavel --=20 (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blo= g.html --jRHKVT23PllUwdXP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlrhbXwACgkQMOfwapXb+vILRwCePKl/ETUU0wWG96+tXyQKzoiq Bq4An1bxPszkX/nco+RsP+Mw1NNlL0Zg =K+sj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jRHKVT23PllUwdXP--