From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:40986 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932874AbeEHSNC (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 May 2018 14:13:02 -0400 From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, keescook@chromium.org, josh@joshtriplett.org, maco@android.com, andy.gross@linaro.org, david.brown@linaro.org, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, teg@jklm.no, wagi@monom.org, hdegoede@redhat.com, andresx7@gmail.com, zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, kubakici@wp.pl, shuah@kernel.org, mfuzzey@parkeon.com, dhowells@redhat.com, pali.rohar@gmail.com, tiwai@suse.de, kvalo@codeaurora.org, arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com, zajec5@gmail.com, nbroeking@me.com, markivx@codeaurora.org, broonie@kernel.org, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, dwmw2@infradead.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, Abhay_Salunke@dell.com, jewalt@lgsinnovations.com, oneukum@suse.com, cantabile.desu@gmail.com, ast@fb.com, hare@suse.com, jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com, khc@pm.waw.pl, davem@davemloft.net, arve@android.com, tkjos@android.com, corbet@lwn.net, mchehab+samsung@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, "Luis R. Rodriguez" Subject: [PATCH v6 07/13] firmware_loader: make firmware_fallback_sysfs() print more useful Date: Tue, 8 May 2018 11:12:41 -0700 Message-Id: <20180508181247.19431-8-mcgrof@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20180508181247.19431-1-mcgrof@kernel.org> References: <20180508181247.19431-1-mcgrof@kernel.org> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: If we resort to using the sysfs fallback mechanism we don't print the filename. This can be deceiving given we could have a series of callers intertwined and it'd be unclear exactly for what firmware this was meant for. Additionally, although we don't currently use FW_OPT_NO_WARN when dealing with the fallback mechanism, we will soon, so just respect its use consistently. And even if you *don't* want to print always on failure, you may want to print when debugging so enable dynamic debug print when FW_OPT_NO_WARN is used. Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez --- drivers/base/firmware_loader/fallback.c | 7 ++++++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/base/firmware_loader/fallback.c b/drivers/base/firmware_loader/fallback.c index 9169e7b9800c..b676a99c469c 100644 --- a/drivers/base/firmware_loader/fallback.c +++ b/drivers/base/firmware_loader/fallback.c @@ -690,6 +690,11 @@ int firmware_fallback_sysfs(struct firmware *fw, const char *name, if (!fw_run_sysfs_fallback(opt_flags)) return ret; - dev_warn(device, "Falling back to user helper\n"); + if (!(opt_flags & FW_OPT_NO_WARN)) + dev_warn(device, "Falling back to syfs fallback for: %s\n", + name); + else + dev_dbg(device, "Falling back to sysfs fallback for: %s\n", + name); return fw_load_from_user_helper(fw, name, device, opt_flags); } -- 2.17.0