linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, tglx@linutronix.de, arnd@arndb.de,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	y2038@lists.linaro.org, jack@suse.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] udf: Simplify calls to udf_disk_stamp_to_time
Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 15:57:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180514135759.r4jxnw7mp3h6ak36@quack2.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180512045921.18311-6-deepa.kernel@gmail.com>

Hello,

On Fri 11-05-18 21:59:20, Deepa Dinamani wrote:
> Subsequent patches in the series convert inode timestamps
> to use struct timespec64 instead of struct timespec as
> part of solving the y2038 problem.
> 
> commit fd3cfad374d4 ("udf: Convert udf_disk_stamp_to_time() to use mktime64()")
> eliminated the NULL return condition from udf_disk_stamp_to_time().
> udf_time_to_disk_time() is always called with a valid dest pointer and
> the return value is ignored.
> Further, caller can as well check the dest pointer being passed in rather
> than return argument.
> Make both the functions return void.
> 
> This will make the inode timestamp conversion simpler.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@gmail.com>
> Cc: jack@suse.com

I'm fine with this. Just one bug below:

> diff --git a/fs/udf/super.c b/fs/udf/super.c
> index 0d27d41f5c6e..bd0ae64bc31c 100644
> --- a/fs/udf/super.c
> +++ b/fs/udf/super.c
> @@ -862,6 +862,9 @@ static int udf_load_pvoldesc(struct super_block *sb, sector_t block)
>  	struct buffer_head *bh;
>  	uint16_t ident;
>  	int ret = -ENOMEM;
> +#ifdef UDFFS_DEBUG
> +	struct timestamp *ts;
> +#endif
>  
>  	outstr = kmalloc(128, GFP_NOFS);
>  	if (!outstr)
> @@ -880,15 +883,14 @@ static int udf_load_pvoldesc(struct super_block *sb, sector_t block)
>  
>  	pvoldesc = (struct primaryVolDesc *)bh->b_data;
>  
> -	if (udf_disk_stamp_to_time(&UDF_SB(sb)->s_record_time,
> -			      pvoldesc->recordingDateAndTime)) {
> +	udf_disk_stamp_to_time(&UDF_SB(sb)->s_record_time,
> +			      pvoldesc->recordingDateAndTime);
>  #ifdef UDFFS_DEBUG
> -		struct timestamp *ts = &pvoldesc->recordingDateAndTime;
> -		udf_debug("recording time %04u/%02u/%02u %02u:%02u (%x)\n",
> -			  le16_to_cpu(ts->year), ts->month, ts->day, ts->hour,
> -			  ts->minute, le16_to_cpu(ts->typeAndTimezone));
> +	*ts = &pvoldesc->recordingDateAndTime;

This should be 'ts ='.

Do you prefer me taking this patch through my tree or will you carry it as
a part of your series?

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR

  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-14 13:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-12  4:59 [PATCH 0/6] Transition vfs to 64-bit timestamps Deepa Dinamani
2018-05-12  4:59 ` [PATCH 1/6] fs: add timespec64_truncate() Deepa Dinamani
2018-05-12  4:59 ` [PATCH 2/6] lustre: Use long long type to print inode time Deepa Dinamani
2018-05-12  4:59 ` [PATCH 3/6] ceph: make inode time prints to be long long Deepa Dinamani
2018-05-12  4:59 ` [PATCH 4/6] fs: nfs: get rid of memcpys for inode times Deepa Dinamani
2018-05-12  4:59 ` [PATCH 5/6] udf: Simplify calls to udf_disk_stamp_to_time Deepa Dinamani
2018-05-14 13:57   ` Jan Kara [this message]
2018-05-15 17:48     ` Deepa Dinamani
2018-05-12  4:59 ` [PATCH 6/6] vfs: change inode times to use struct timespec64 Deepa Dinamani
2018-05-12  6:44   ` Kees Cook
2018-05-14  4:05     ` Deepa Dinamani
2018-05-14 16:30       ` Kees Cook
2018-05-14 17:25         ` Deepa Dinamani
2018-05-14 17:53           ` Kees Cook
2018-05-14 18:23             ` Deepa Dinamani
2018-05-14 18:28               ` Kees Cook
2018-05-17  1:13               ` Arnd Bergmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180514135759.r4jxnw7mp3h6ak36@quack2.suse.cz \
    --to=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=deepa.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=y2038@lists.linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).