From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Mon, 21 May 2018 03:11:39 -0700 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Ross Zwisler , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Matthew Wilcox , Jan Kara , Jeff Layton , Lukas Czerner , Christoph Hellwig , Goldwyn Rodrigues , Nicholas Piggin , Ryusuke Konishi , linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org, Jaegeuk Kim , Chao Yu , linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Oleg Drokin , Andreas Dilger , James Simmons , Mike Kravetz Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 53/63] dax: Rename some functions Message-ID: <20180521101139.GA20878@bombadil.infradead.org> References: <20180414141316.7167-1-willy@infradead.org> <20180414141316.7167-54-willy@infradead.org> <20180521044236.GC27043@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180521044236.GC27043@linux.intel.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 10:42:36PM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote: > > -static void *dax_radix_locked_entry(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long flags) > > +static void *dax_mk_locked(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long flags) > > Let's continue to use whole words in function names instead of abbreviations > for readability. Can you please s/dax_mk_locked/dax_make_locked/ ? > > I do realize that the xarray function is xa_mk_value() (which I also think is > perhaps too brief for readability), but in the rest of DAX we use full words > everywhere. I find the current DAX code to be _so_ wordy that it obscures readability. This particular instance isn't a hill worth dying on; I'll change it. > > @@ -1519,15 +1517,14 @@ int dax_iomap_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf, enum page_entry_size pe_size, > > } > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dax_iomap_fault); > > > > -/** > > +/* > > Let's leave the double ** so that the function is picked up properly by > the documentation system, and so it's consistent with the rest of the > functions. This function is static. I think it's worth keeping the documentation, but making it part of the exported kernel API documentation is confusing. By the way, nothing at all in fs/dax.c is picked up by the documentation system today. We should probably fix that ... did you want to look at it or shall I propose a patch to anchor it somewhere?