From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:46673 "EHLO newverein.lst.de"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1751767AbeE1FJ2 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 28 May 2018 01:09:28 -0400
Date: Mon, 28 May 2018 07:15:29 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] aio: all callers of aio_{read,write,fsync,poll}
        treat 0 and -EIOCBQUEUED the same way
Message-ID: <20180528051529.GA2806@lst.de>
References: <20180527222730.GS30522@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20180527222853.30715-1-viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20180527222853.30715-1-viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>

On Sun, May 27, 2018 at 11:28:50PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
> 
> ... so just make them return 0 when caller does not need to destroy iocb
> 
> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Looks good,

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

But I think we really need a better name for aio_rw_ret now.
Unfortunately I can't think of one.