linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfs: add support for sub-pagesize writeback without buffer_heads
Date: Mon, 28 May 2018 08:57:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180528065750.GA5098@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180525171714.GB92502@bfoster.bfoster>

On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 01:17:15PM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 04:46:46PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Switch to using the iomap_page structure for checking sub-page uptodate
> > status and track sub-page I/O completion status, and remove large
> > quantities of boilerplate code working around buffer heads.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> > ---
> >  fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c  | 536 +++++++--------------------------------------
> >  fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h   |   1 -
> >  fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c |   3 -
> >  fs/xfs/xfs_super.c |   2 +-
> >  fs/xfs/xfs_trace.h |  18 +-
> >  5 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 481 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
> > index efa2cbb27d67..d279929e53fb 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
> ...
> > @@ -768,7 +620,7 @@ xfs_aops_discard_page(
> >  	int			error;
> >  
> >  	if (XFS_FORCED_SHUTDOWN(mp))
> > -		goto out_invalidate;
> > +		goto out;
> >  
> >  	xfs_alert(mp,
> >  		"page discard on page "PTR_FMT", inode 0x%llx, offset %llu.",
> > @@ -778,15 +630,15 @@ xfs_aops_discard_page(
> >  			PAGE_SIZE / i_blocksize(inode));
> >  	if (error && !XFS_FORCED_SHUTDOWN(mp))
> >  		xfs_alert(mp, "page discard unable to remove delalloc mapping.");
> > -out_invalidate:
> > -	xfs_vm_invalidatepage(page, 0, PAGE_SIZE);
> > +out:
> > +	iomap_invalidatepage(page, 0, PAGE_SIZE);
> 
> All this does is lose the tracepoint. I don't think this call needs to
> change. The rest looks Ok to me, but I still need to run some tests on
> the whole thing.

Ok.  I actually had it that way, then thought we shouldn't need the
invalidatepage without bufferheads, but it turns out we still do and
added it back this way.  I'll go back to start and won't collect $200..

  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-28  6:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-23 14:46 sub-page blocksize support in iomap non-buffer head path v3 Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-23 14:46 ` [PATCH 1/2] iomap: add support for sub-pagesize buffered I/O without buffer heads Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-25 17:17   ` Brian Foster
2018-05-28  6:50     ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-23 14:46 ` [PATCH 2/2] xfs: add support for sub-pagesize writeback without buffer_heads Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-25 17:17   ` Brian Foster
2018-05-28  6:57     ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-05-18 16:52 sub-page blocksize support in iomap non-buffer head path Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-18 16:52 ` [PATCH 2/2] xfs: add support for sub-pagesize writeback without buffer_heads Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180528065750.GA5098@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).