linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Linux Audit <linux-audit@redhat.com>,
	Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/10] audit: Factor out chunk replacement code
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 11:23:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180711092358.br35lim3kiqwvmgk@quack2.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOQ4uxie_1xTs-eMTDXF2Dc8Azt+jiUpV25TQ4mELMPDwP=A0g@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed 11-07-18 12:01:35, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 11:26 AM, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> wrote:
> > On Wed 11-07-18 10:58:24, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 1:02 PM, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> wrote:
> >> > Chunk replacement code is very similar for the cases where we grow or
> >> > shrink chunk. Factor the code out into a common helper function.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> >>
> >> Ack. Nice re-factoring.
> >
> > Thanks. BTW, I didn't add your Acked-by tags because it wasn't obvious to
> > me whether you meant them as an official tag-worthy statement. So do want
> > me to add the tags or do you prefer to stay "anonymous reviewer" ;)?
> >
> 
> Don't feel confident enough with Reviewed-by/Acked-by on this series,
> just letting you know that I eyeballed your patches FWIW ;-)
> 
> I'm down to the last one, which is agonizing to make sure nothing is missed
> from the diff. At this point [10/10] I'd rather review the final code.

Yes, changing lifetime rules is almost always painful, especially in the
code you don't understand too well. It took me a day to understand audit
well enough to be confident to make that change...

> Can you push the work to a branch.

Sure, audit_cleanup branch pushed out to
  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jack/linux-fs.git

Thanks for your review!

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR

  reply	other threads:[~2018-07-11  9:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-10 10:02 [PATCH 0/10 v2] audit: Fix various races when tagging and untagging mounts Jan Kara
2018-07-10 10:02 ` [PATCH 01/10] audit_tree: Remove mark->lock locking Jan Kara
2018-07-27  4:47   ` Paul Moore
2018-09-04  9:53     ` Jan Kara
2018-07-10 10:02 ` [PATCH 02/10] audit: Fix possible spurious -ENOSPC error Jan Kara
2018-07-27  4:47   ` Paul Moore
2018-09-04 10:00     ` Jan Kara
2018-07-10 10:02 ` [PATCH 03/10] audit: Fix possible tagging failures Jan Kara
2018-07-10 10:02 ` [PATCH 04/10] audit: Embed key into chunk Jan Kara
2018-07-27  4:47   ` Paul Moore
2018-07-10 10:02 ` [PATCH 05/10] audit: Make hash table insertion safe against concurrent lookups Jan Kara
2018-07-10 10:02 ` [PATCH 06/10] audit: Factor out chunk replacement code Jan Kara
2018-07-11  7:58   ` Amir Goldstein
2018-07-11  8:26     ` Jan Kara
2018-07-11  9:01       ` Amir Goldstein
2018-07-11  9:23         ` Jan Kara [this message]
2018-07-27  4:47   ` Paul Moore
2018-07-10 10:02 ` [PATCH 07/10] audit: Remove pointless check in insert_hash() Jan Kara
2018-07-27  4:47   ` Paul Moore
2018-07-10 10:02 ` [PATCH 08/10] audit: Provide helper for dropping mark's chunk reference Jan Kara
2018-07-10 10:02 ` [PATCH 09/10] audit: Allocate fsnotify mark independently of chunk Jan Kara
2018-07-11  8:57   ` Amir Goldstein
2018-07-11 10:48     ` Amir Goldstein
2018-07-16 15:13       ` Jan Kara
2018-07-27  4:47   ` Paul Moore
2018-09-04 14:03     ` Jan Kara
2018-09-04 14:07       ` Jan Kara
2018-07-10 10:02 ` [PATCH 10/10] audit: Replace chunk attached to mark instead of replacing mark Jan Kara
2018-07-11 14:17   ` Amir Goldstein
2018-07-27  4:47   ` Paul Moore
2018-09-04 14:11     ` Jan Kara
2018-07-10 10:02 ` [PATCH 11/10 TESTSUITE] audit_testsuite: Add stress test for tree watches Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180711092358.br35lim3kiqwvmgk@quack2.suse.cz \
    --to=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=rgb@redhat.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).