From: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de>
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>,
linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/4] vfs: map unique ino/dev pairs for user space
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2018 14:10:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180731211045.5671-1-mfasheh@suse.de> (raw)
Hi,
These patches are follow-up to this conversation on fsdevel which provides a
good break-down of the core problem:
https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-fsdevel/msg128003.html
That e-mail was in turn a follow-up to the following patch series:
https://lwn.net/Articles/753917/
which tried to solve the dev portion of this problem with a bit of structure
re-routing but was never accepted.
We have an inconsistency in how the kernel is exporting inode number /
device pairs for user space. I'm not talking about stat(2) or statx(2) here
but everywhere else where an ino/dev is exported into a buffer for user
space.
We typically do this by simply dumping the potentially 32 bit inode->i_ino
and single device from super->s_dev. Sometimes these values differ from
what is returned via stat(2) or statx(2). Some filesystems might even show
duplicate (but internally different!) pairs when the raw i_ino/s_dev is
used.
Aside from breaking software which expects these pairs to be unique, this
can put the user in a situation where they might not be able to find an
inode referenced from some kernel log (be it /proc/, printk buffer, etc).
What's even worse - depending on how ino is exported, they might even find
an existing but /wrong/ file.
The following patches fix these inconsistencies by introducing a VFS helper
function which calls the underlying filesystem ->getattr to get our real
inode number / device pair. The returned values can then be used at those
places in the kernel where we are incorrectly reporting our ino/dev pair.
We then update fs/proc/ and fs/locks.c to use this helper when writing to
/proc/PID/maps and /proc/locks respectively.
For anyone who is watching the evolution of these patches, this would be one
implementation of the 'callback' method which I discussed in my last e-mail.
This approach is very straight forward and easy to understand but has some
drawbacks:
- Not all of the call sites can tolerate errors. Instead, we fallback to
inode->i_ino and super->s_dev in case of getattr error. That behavior is
no worse than what we have today but what we have today is pretty bad so I
don't particularly feel good about that. It's better than nothing though.
- There are places in the kernel where we could never call into ->getattr.
There are tons of tracepoints for example that are printing the the wrong
ino/dev pair.
- The helper function has to fake a path struct because getting a vfsmount
from inside these call sites is impossible. This isn't actually a big
deal as nobody except NFS cares and the NFS patch is very trivial. It's
ugly though, so if we had consensus on this approach I would happily
rework our ->getattr function signature, perhaps pulling the vfsmount and
dentry arguments back out.
- The dentry argument to ->getattr is potentially problematic as we have
some places which _only_ have an inode. Even if we had a dentry I'm not
sure what would keep it from going negative while in the middle of our
->getattr call.
Comments and review would be greatly appreciated. Thanks,
--Mark
next reply other threads:[~2018-07-31 22:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-31 21:10 Mark Fasheh [this message]
2018-07-31 21:10 ` [PATCH 1/4] vfs: introduce function to map unique ino/dev pairs Mark Fasheh
2018-07-31 23:21 ` Mark Fasheh
2018-08-01 5:41 ` Amir Goldstein
2018-08-01 15:59 ` Mark Fasheh
2018-07-31 21:10 ` [PATCH 2/4] nfs: check for NULL vfsmount in nfs_getattr Mark Fasheh
2018-07-31 22:16 ` Al Viro
2018-07-31 22:51 ` Mark Fasheh
2018-08-02 0:43 ` Al Viro
2018-08-03 2:04 ` Mark Fasheh
2018-07-31 21:10 ` [PATCH 3/4] proc: use vfs helper to get ino/dev pairs for maps file Mark Fasheh
2018-07-31 21:10 ` [PATCH 4/4] locks: map correct ino/dev pairs when exporting to userspace Mark Fasheh
2018-08-01 5:37 ` Amir Goldstein
2018-08-01 17:45 ` Mark Fasheh
2018-08-01 11:03 ` Jeff Layton
2018-08-01 20:38 ` Mark Fasheh
2018-08-02 0:24 ` [RFC PATCH 0/4] vfs: map unique ino/dev pairs for user space J. R. Okajima
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180731211045.5671-1-mfasheh@suse.de \
--to=mfasheh@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=jeffm@suse.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).