From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
linux-audit@redhat.com, <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
rgb@redhat.com, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Subject: [PATCH 01/11] audit_tree: Remove mark->lock locking
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2018 18:06:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180904160632.21210-2-jack@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180904160632.21210-1-jack@suse.cz>
Currently, audit_tree code uses mark->lock to protect against detaching
of mark from an inode. In most places it however also uses
mark->group->mark_mutex (as we need to atomically replace attached
marks) and this provides protection against mark detaching as well. So
just remove protection with mark->lock from audit tree code and replace
it with mark->group->mark_mutex protection in all the places. It
simplifies the code and gets rid of some ugly catches like calling
fsnotify_add_mark_locked() with mark->lock held (which cannot sleep only
because we hold a reference to another mark attached to the same inode).
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
---
kernel/audit_tree.c | 24 ++++--------------------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/audit_tree.c b/kernel/audit_tree.c
index ea43181cde4a..1b55b1026a36 100644
--- a/kernel/audit_tree.c
+++ b/kernel/audit_tree.c
@@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ static inline struct list_head *chunk_hash(unsigned long key)
return chunk_hash_heads + n % HASH_SIZE;
}
-/* hash_lock & entry->lock is held by caller */
+/* hash_lock & entry->group->mark_mutex is held by caller */
static void insert_hash(struct audit_chunk *chunk)
{
unsigned long key = chunk_to_key(chunk);
@@ -256,13 +256,11 @@ static void untag_chunk(struct node *p)
new = alloc_chunk(size);
mutex_lock(&entry->group->mark_mutex);
- spin_lock(&entry->lock);
/*
* mark_mutex protects mark from getting detached and thus also from
* mark->connector->obj getting NULL.
*/
if (chunk->dead || !(entry->flags & FSNOTIFY_MARK_FLAG_ATTACHED)) {
- spin_unlock(&entry->lock);
mutex_unlock(&entry->group->mark_mutex);
if (new)
fsnotify_put_mark(&new->mark);
@@ -280,7 +278,6 @@ static void untag_chunk(struct node *p)
list_del_init(&p->list);
list_del_rcu(&chunk->hash);
spin_unlock(&hash_lock);
- spin_unlock(&entry->lock);
mutex_unlock(&entry->group->mark_mutex);
fsnotify_destroy_mark(entry, audit_tree_group);
goto out;
@@ -323,7 +320,6 @@ static void untag_chunk(struct node *p)
list_for_each_entry(owner, &new->trees, same_root)
owner->root = new;
spin_unlock(&hash_lock);
- spin_unlock(&entry->lock);
mutex_unlock(&entry->group->mark_mutex);
fsnotify_destroy_mark(entry, audit_tree_group);
fsnotify_put_mark(&new->mark); /* drop initial reference */
@@ -340,7 +336,6 @@ static void untag_chunk(struct node *p)
p->owner = NULL;
put_tree(owner);
spin_unlock(&hash_lock);
- spin_unlock(&entry->lock);
mutex_unlock(&entry->group->mark_mutex);
out:
fsnotify_put_mark(entry);
@@ -360,12 +355,12 @@ static int create_chunk(struct inode *inode, struct audit_tree *tree)
return -ENOSPC;
}
- spin_lock(&entry->lock);
+ mutex_lock(&entry->group->mark_mutex);
spin_lock(&hash_lock);
if (tree->goner) {
spin_unlock(&hash_lock);
chunk->dead = 1;
- spin_unlock(&entry->lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&entry->group->mark_mutex);
fsnotify_destroy_mark(entry, audit_tree_group);
fsnotify_put_mark(entry);
return 0;
@@ -380,7 +375,7 @@ static int create_chunk(struct inode *inode, struct audit_tree *tree)
}
insert_hash(chunk);
spin_unlock(&hash_lock);
- spin_unlock(&entry->lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&entry->group->mark_mutex);
fsnotify_put_mark(entry); /* drop initial reference */
return 0;
}
@@ -421,14 +416,12 @@ static int tag_chunk(struct inode *inode, struct audit_tree *tree)
chunk_entry = &chunk->mark;
mutex_lock(&old_entry->group->mark_mutex);
- spin_lock(&old_entry->lock);
/*
* mark_mutex protects mark from getting detached and thus also from
* mark->connector->obj getting NULL.
*/
if (!(old_entry->flags & FSNOTIFY_MARK_FLAG_ATTACHED)) {
/* old_entry is being shot, lets just lie */
- spin_unlock(&old_entry->lock);
mutex_unlock(&old_entry->group->mark_mutex);
fsnotify_put_mark(old_entry);
fsnotify_put_mark(&chunk->mark);
@@ -437,23 +430,16 @@ static int tag_chunk(struct inode *inode, struct audit_tree *tree)
if (fsnotify_add_mark_locked(chunk_entry, old_entry->connector->obj,
FSNOTIFY_OBJ_TYPE_INODE, 1)) {
- spin_unlock(&old_entry->lock);
mutex_unlock(&old_entry->group->mark_mutex);
fsnotify_put_mark(chunk_entry);
fsnotify_put_mark(old_entry);
return -ENOSPC;
}
- /* even though we hold old_entry->lock, this is safe since chunk_entry->lock could NEVER have been grabbed before */
- spin_lock(&chunk_entry->lock);
spin_lock(&hash_lock);
-
- /* we now hold old_entry->lock, chunk_entry->lock, and hash_lock */
if (tree->goner) {
spin_unlock(&hash_lock);
chunk->dead = 1;
- spin_unlock(&chunk_entry->lock);
- spin_unlock(&old_entry->lock);
mutex_unlock(&old_entry->group->mark_mutex);
fsnotify_destroy_mark(chunk_entry, audit_tree_group);
@@ -485,8 +471,6 @@ static int tag_chunk(struct inode *inode, struct audit_tree *tree)
list_add(&tree->same_root, &chunk->trees);
}
spin_unlock(&hash_lock);
- spin_unlock(&chunk_entry->lock);
- spin_unlock(&old_entry->lock);
mutex_unlock(&old_entry->group->mark_mutex);
fsnotify_destroy_mark(old_entry, audit_tree_group);
fsnotify_put_mark(chunk_entry); /* drop initial reference */
--
2.16.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-04 20:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-04 16:06 [PATCH 0/11 v3] audit: Fix various races when tagging and untagging mounts Jan Kara
2018-09-04 16:06 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2018-09-04 16:06 ` [PATCH 02/11] audit: Fix possible spurious -ENOSPC error Jan Kara
2018-09-04 16:06 ` [PATCH 03/11] audit: Fix possible tagging failures Jan Kara
2018-09-04 16:06 ` [PATCH 04/11] audit: Embed key into chunk Jan Kara
2018-09-13 20:06 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2018-09-04 16:06 ` [PATCH 05/11] audit: Make hash table insertion safe against concurrent lookups Jan Kara
2018-09-04 16:06 ` [PATCH 06/11] audit: Factor out chunk replacement code Jan Kara
2018-09-04 16:06 ` [PATCH 07/11] audit: Remove pointless check in insert_hash() Jan Kara
2018-09-04 16:06 ` [PATCH 08/11] audit: Provide helper for dropping mark's chunk reference Jan Kara
2018-09-04 16:06 ` [PATCH 09/11] audit: Allocate fsnotify mark independently of chunk Jan Kara
2018-09-14 14:09 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2018-09-17 16:46 ` Jan Kara
2018-10-03 22:11 ` Paul Moore
2018-10-03 22:08 ` Paul Moore
2018-10-03 22:39 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2018-10-04 6:57 ` Jan Kara
2018-09-04 16:06 ` [PATCH 10/11] audit: Replace chunk attached to mark instead of replacing mark Jan Kara
2018-09-04 16:06 ` [PATCH 11/11] audit: Use 'mark' name for fsnotify_mark variables Jan Kara
2018-09-14 18:29 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2018-09-17 16:44 ` Jan Kara
2018-09-17 18:13 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2018-09-04 16:06 ` [PATCH 12/11 TESTSUITE] audit_testsuite: Add stress test for tree watches Jan Kara
2018-09-14 18:21 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2018-09-17 16:56 ` Jan Kara
2018-10-05 21:06 ` Paul Moore
2018-10-09 7:40 ` Jan Kara
2018-10-10 6:43 ` Paul Moore
2018-10-11 11:39 ` Jan Kara
2018-10-11 23:03 ` Paul Moore
2018-10-15 10:04 ` Jan Kara
2018-10-15 15:39 ` Paul Moore
2018-10-17 10:09 ` Jan Kara
2018-11-14 0:34 ` Paul Moore
2018-11-14 12:16 ` Jan Kara
2018-11-19 15:19 ` Paul Moore
2018-09-14 19:13 ` [PATCH 0/11 v3] audit: Fix various races when tagging and untagging mounts Richard Guy Briggs
2018-09-17 16:57 ` Jan Kara
2018-10-04 1:20 ` Paul Moore
2018-10-04 6:59 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180904160632.21210-2-jack@suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=rgb@redhat.com \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).