linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-audit@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] audit: Use 'mark' name for fsnotify_mark variables
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2018 14:29:45 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180914182945.oxlmb6gednsza4wg@madcap2.tricolour.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180904160632.21210-12-jack@suse.cz>

On 2018-09-04 18:06, Jan Kara wrote:
> Variables pointing to fsnotify_mark are sometimes called 'entry' and
> sometimes 'mark'. Use 'mark' in all places.

Thank you, thank you, thank you!  This would have been great at the
beginning of the patchset!

> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> ---
>  kernel/audit_tree.c | 95 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
>  1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/audit_tree.c b/kernel/audit_tree.c
> index ef109000ed01..9c53f7c37bdf 100644
> --- a/kernel/audit_tree.c
> +++ b/kernel/audit_tree.c
> @@ -158,9 +158,9 @@ static void audit_mark_put_chunk(struct audit_chunk *chunk)
>  	call_rcu(&chunk->head, __put_chunk);
>  }
>  
> -static inline struct audit_tree_mark *audit_mark(struct fsnotify_mark *entry)
> +static inline struct audit_tree_mark *audit_mark(struct fsnotify_mark *mark)
>  {
> -	return container_of(entry, struct audit_tree_mark, mark);
> +	return container_of(mark, struct audit_tree_mark, mark);
>  }
>  
>  static struct audit_chunk *mark_chunk(struct fsnotify_mark *mark)
> @@ -168,9 +168,9 @@ static struct audit_chunk *mark_chunk(struct fsnotify_mark *mark)
>  	return audit_mark(mark)->chunk;
>  }
>  
> -static void audit_tree_destroy_watch(struct fsnotify_mark *entry)
> +static void audit_tree_destroy_watch(struct fsnotify_mark *mark)
>  {
> -	kmem_cache_free(audit_tree_mark_cachep, audit_mark(entry));
> +	kmem_cache_free(audit_tree_mark_cachep, audit_mark(mark));
>  }
>  
>  static struct fsnotify_mark *alloc_mark(void)
> @@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ static inline struct list_head *chunk_hash(unsigned long key)
>  	return chunk_hash_heads + n % HASH_SIZE;
>  }
>  
> -/* hash_lock & entry->group->mark_mutex is held by caller */
> +/* hash_lock & mark->group->mark_mutex is held by caller */
>  static void insert_hash(struct audit_chunk *chunk)
>  {
>  	struct list_head *list;
> @@ -278,16 +278,16 @@ static struct audit_chunk *find_chunk(struct node *p)
>  	return container_of(p, struct audit_chunk, owners[0]);
>  }
>  
> -static void replace_mark_chunk(struct fsnotify_mark *entry,
> +static void replace_mark_chunk(struct fsnotify_mark *mark,
>  			       struct audit_chunk *chunk)
>  {
>  	struct audit_chunk *old;
>  
>  	assert_spin_locked(&hash_lock);
> -	old = mark_chunk(entry);
> -	audit_mark(entry)->chunk = chunk;
> +	old = mark_chunk(mark);
> +	audit_mark(mark)->chunk = chunk;
>  	if (chunk)
> -		chunk->mark = entry;
> +		chunk->mark = mark;
>  	if (old)
>  		old->mark = NULL;
>  }
> @@ -328,30 +328,30 @@ static void replace_chunk(struct audit_chunk *new, struct audit_chunk *old,
>  static void untag_chunk(struct node *p)
>  {
>  	struct audit_chunk *chunk = find_chunk(p);
> -	struct fsnotify_mark *entry = chunk->mark;
> +	struct fsnotify_mark *mark = chunk->mark;
>  	struct audit_chunk *new = NULL;
>  	struct audit_tree *owner;
>  	int size = chunk->count - 1;
>  
>  	/* Racing with audit_tree_freeing_mark()? */
> -	if (!entry)
> +	if (!mark)
>  		return;
>  
> -	fsnotify_get_mark(entry);
> +	fsnotify_get_mark(mark);
>  
>  	spin_unlock(&hash_lock);
>  
>  	if (size)
>  		new = alloc_chunk(size);
>  
> -	mutex_lock(&entry->group->mark_mutex);
> +	mutex_lock(&mark->group->mark_mutex);
>  	/*
>  	 * mark_mutex stabilizes chunk attached to the mark so we can check
>  	 * whether it didn't change while we've dropped hash_lock.
>  	 */
> -	if (!(entry->flags & FSNOTIFY_MARK_FLAG_ATTACHED) ||
> -	    mark_chunk(entry) != chunk) {
> -		mutex_unlock(&entry->group->mark_mutex);
> +	if (!(mark->flags & FSNOTIFY_MARK_FLAG_ATTACHED) ||
> +	    mark_chunk(mark) != chunk) {
> +		mutex_unlock(&mark->group->mark_mutex);
>  		kfree(new);
>  		goto out;
>  	}
> @@ -365,12 +365,12 @@ static void untag_chunk(struct node *p)
>  			owner->root = NULL;
>  		list_del_init(&p->list);
>  		list_del_rcu(&chunk->hash);
> -		replace_mark_chunk(entry, NULL);
> +		replace_mark_chunk(mark, NULL);
>  		spin_unlock(&hash_lock);
> -		fsnotify_detach_mark(entry);
> -		mutex_unlock(&entry->group->mark_mutex);
> +		fsnotify_detach_mark(mark);
> +		mutex_unlock(&mark->group->mark_mutex);
>  		audit_mark_put_chunk(chunk);
> -		fsnotify_free_mark(entry);
> +		fsnotify_free_mark(mark);
>  		goto out;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ static void untag_chunk(struct node *p)
>  	 */
>  	replace_chunk(new, chunk, p);
>  	spin_unlock(&hash_lock);
> -	mutex_unlock(&entry->group->mark_mutex);
> +	mutex_unlock(&mark->group->mark_mutex);
>  	audit_mark_put_chunk(chunk);
>  	goto out;
>  
> @@ -404,16 +404,16 @@ static void untag_chunk(struct node *p)
>  	p->owner = NULL;
>  	put_tree(owner);
>  	spin_unlock(&hash_lock);
> -	mutex_unlock(&entry->group->mark_mutex);
> +	mutex_unlock(&mark->group->mark_mutex);
>  out:
> -	fsnotify_put_mark(entry);
> +	fsnotify_put_mark(mark);
>  	spin_lock(&hash_lock);
>  }
>  
>  /* Call with group->mark_mutex held, releases it */
>  static int create_chunk(struct inode *inode, struct audit_tree *tree)
>  {
> -	struct fsnotify_mark *entry;
> +	struct fsnotify_mark *mark;
>  	struct audit_chunk *chunk = alloc_chunk(1);
>  
>  	if (!chunk) {
> @@ -421,16 +421,16 @@ static int create_chunk(struct inode *inode, struct audit_tree *tree)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  	}
>  
> -	entry = alloc_mark();
> -	if (!entry) {
> +	mark = alloc_mark();
> +	if (!mark) {
>  		mutex_unlock(&audit_tree_group->mark_mutex);
>  		kfree(chunk);
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (fsnotify_add_inode_mark_locked(entry, inode, 0)) {
> +	if (fsnotify_add_inode_mark_locked(mark, inode, 0)) {
>  		mutex_unlock(&audit_tree_group->mark_mutex);
> -		fsnotify_put_mark(entry);
> +		fsnotify_put_mark(mark);
>  		kfree(chunk);
>  		return -ENOSPC;
>  	}
> @@ -438,14 +438,14 @@ static int create_chunk(struct inode *inode, struct audit_tree *tree)
>  	spin_lock(&hash_lock);
>  	if (tree->goner) {
>  		spin_unlock(&hash_lock);
> -		fsnotify_detach_mark(entry);
> +		fsnotify_detach_mark(mark);
>  		mutex_unlock(&audit_tree_group->mark_mutex);
> -		fsnotify_free_mark(entry);
> -		fsnotify_put_mark(entry);
> +		fsnotify_free_mark(mark);
> +		fsnotify_put_mark(mark);
>  		kfree(chunk);
>  		return 0;
>  	}
> -	replace_mark_chunk(entry, chunk);
> +	replace_mark_chunk(mark, chunk);
>  	chunk->owners[0].index = (1U << 31);
>  	chunk->owners[0].owner = tree;
>  	get_tree(tree);
> @@ -467,21 +467,21 @@ static int create_chunk(struct inode *inode, struct audit_tree *tree)
>  	 * we get notification through ->freeing_mark callback and cleanup
>  	 * chunk pointing to this mark.
>  	 */
> -	fsnotify_put_mark(entry);
> +	fsnotify_put_mark(mark);
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  /* the first tagged inode becomes root of tree */
>  static int tag_chunk(struct inode *inode, struct audit_tree *tree)
>  {
> -	struct fsnotify_mark *entry;
> +	struct fsnotify_mark *mark;
>  	struct audit_chunk *chunk, *old;
>  	struct node *p;
>  	int n;
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&audit_tree_group->mark_mutex);
> -	entry = fsnotify_find_mark(&inode->i_fsnotify_marks, audit_tree_group);
> -	if (!entry)
> +	mark = fsnotify_find_mark(&inode->i_fsnotify_marks, audit_tree_group);
> +	if (!mark)
>  		return create_chunk(inode, tree);
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -491,12 +491,12 @@ static int tag_chunk(struct inode *inode, struct audit_tree *tree)
>  	 */
>  	/* are we already there? */
>  	spin_lock(&hash_lock);
> -	old = mark_chunk(entry);
> +	old = mark_chunk(mark);
>  	for (n = 0; n < old->count; n++) {
>  		if (old->owners[n].owner == tree) {
>  			spin_unlock(&hash_lock);
>  			mutex_unlock(&audit_tree_group->mark_mutex);
> -			fsnotify_put_mark(entry);
> +			fsnotify_put_mark(mark);
>  			return 0;
>  		}
>  	}
> @@ -505,7 +505,7 @@ static int tag_chunk(struct inode *inode, struct audit_tree *tree)
>  	chunk = alloc_chunk(old->count + 1);
>  	if (!chunk) {
>  		mutex_unlock(&audit_tree_group->mark_mutex);
> -		fsnotify_put_mark(entry);
> +		fsnotify_put_mark(mark);
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -513,7 +513,7 @@ static int tag_chunk(struct inode *inode, struct audit_tree *tree)
>  	if (tree->goner) {
>  		spin_unlock(&hash_lock);
>  		mutex_unlock(&audit_tree_group->mark_mutex);
> -		fsnotify_put_mark(entry);
> +		fsnotify_put_mark(mark);
>  		kfree(chunk);
>  		return 0;
>  	}
> @@ -533,7 +533,7 @@ static int tag_chunk(struct inode *inode, struct audit_tree *tree)
>  	replace_chunk(chunk, old, NULL);
>  	spin_unlock(&hash_lock);
>  	mutex_unlock(&audit_tree_group->mark_mutex);
> -	fsnotify_put_mark(entry); /* pair to fsnotify_find mark_entry */
> +	fsnotify_put_mark(mark); /* pair to fsnotify_find_mark */
>  	audit_mark_put_chunk(old);
>  
>  	return 0;
> @@ -1040,16 +1040,17 @@ static int audit_tree_handle_event(struct fsnotify_group *group,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static void audit_tree_freeing_mark(struct fsnotify_mark *entry, struct fsnotify_group *group)
> +static void audit_tree_freeing_mark(struct fsnotify_mark *mark,
> +				    struct fsnotify_group *group)
>  {
>  	struct audit_chunk *chunk;
>  
> -	mutex_lock(&entry->group->mark_mutex);
> +	mutex_lock(&mark->group->mark_mutex);
>  	spin_lock(&hash_lock);
> -	chunk = mark_chunk(entry);
> -	replace_mark_chunk(entry, NULL);
> +	chunk = mark_chunk(mark);
> +	replace_mark_chunk(mark, NULL);
>  	spin_unlock(&hash_lock);
> -	mutex_unlock(&entry->group->mark_mutex);
> +	mutex_unlock(&mark->group->mark_mutex);
>  	if (chunk) {
>  		evict_chunk(chunk);
>  		audit_mark_put_chunk(chunk);
> @@ -1059,7 +1060,7 @@ static void audit_tree_freeing_mark(struct fsnotify_mark *entry, struct fsnotify
>  	 * We are guaranteed to have at least one reference to the mark from
>  	 * either the inode or the caller of fsnotify_destroy_mark().
>  	 */
> -	BUG_ON(refcount_read(&entry->refcnt) < 1);
> +	BUG_ON(refcount_read(&mark->refcnt) < 1);
>  }
>  
>  static const struct fsnotify_ops audit_tree_ops = {
> -- 
> 2.16.4
> 

- RGB

--
Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>
Sr. S/W Engineer, Kernel Security, Base Operating Systems
Remote, Ottawa, Red Hat Canada
IRC: rgb, SunRaycer
Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635

  reply	other threads:[~2018-09-14 23:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-04 16:06 [PATCH 0/11 v3] audit: Fix various races when tagging and untagging mounts Jan Kara
2018-09-04 16:06 ` [PATCH 01/11] audit_tree: Remove mark->lock locking Jan Kara
2018-09-04 16:06 ` [PATCH 02/11] audit: Fix possible spurious -ENOSPC error Jan Kara
2018-09-04 16:06 ` [PATCH 03/11] audit: Fix possible tagging failures Jan Kara
2018-09-04 16:06 ` [PATCH 04/11] audit: Embed key into chunk Jan Kara
2018-09-13 20:06   ` Richard Guy Briggs
2018-09-04 16:06 ` [PATCH 05/11] audit: Make hash table insertion safe against concurrent lookups Jan Kara
2018-09-04 16:06 ` [PATCH 06/11] audit: Factor out chunk replacement code Jan Kara
2018-09-04 16:06 ` [PATCH 07/11] audit: Remove pointless check in insert_hash() Jan Kara
2018-09-04 16:06 ` [PATCH 08/11] audit: Provide helper for dropping mark's chunk reference Jan Kara
2018-09-04 16:06 ` [PATCH 09/11] audit: Allocate fsnotify mark independently of chunk Jan Kara
2018-09-14 14:09   ` Richard Guy Briggs
2018-09-17 16:46     ` Jan Kara
2018-10-03 22:11       ` Paul Moore
2018-10-03 22:08   ` Paul Moore
2018-10-03 22:39     ` Richard Guy Briggs
2018-10-04  6:57     ` Jan Kara
2018-09-04 16:06 ` [PATCH 10/11] audit: Replace chunk attached to mark instead of replacing mark Jan Kara
2018-09-04 16:06 ` [PATCH 11/11] audit: Use 'mark' name for fsnotify_mark variables Jan Kara
2018-09-14 18:29   ` Richard Guy Briggs [this message]
2018-09-17 16:44     ` Jan Kara
2018-09-17 18:13       ` Richard Guy Briggs
2018-09-04 16:06 ` [PATCH 12/11 TESTSUITE] audit_testsuite: Add stress test for tree watches Jan Kara
2018-09-14 18:21   ` Richard Guy Briggs
2018-09-17 16:56     ` Jan Kara
2018-10-05 21:06   ` Paul Moore
2018-10-09  7:40     ` Jan Kara
2018-10-10  6:43       ` Paul Moore
2018-10-11 11:39         ` Jan Kara
2018-10-11 23:03           ` Paul Moore
2018-10-15 10:04             ` Jan Kara
2018-10-15 15:39               ` Paul Moore
2018-10-17 10:09                 ` Jan Kara
2018-11-14  0:34   ` Paul Moore
2018-11-14 12:16     ` Jan Kara
2018-11-19 15:19       ` Paul Moore
2018-09-14 19:13 ` [PATCH 0/11 v3] audit: Fix various races when tagging and untagging mounts Richard Guy Briggs
2018-09-17 16:57   ` Jan Kara
2018-10-04  1:20     ` Paul Moore
2018-10-04  6:59       ` Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180914182945.oxlmb6gednsza4wg@madcap2.tricolour.ca \
    --to=rgb@redhat.com \
    --cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).