From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2018 09:08:05 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Dave Chinner Cc: Ming Lei , linux-block , linux-mm , Linux FS Devel , "open list:XFS FILESYSTEM" , Dave Chinner , Vitaly Kuznetsov , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Christoph Hellwig , Jens Axboe , Ming Lei Subject: Re: block: DMA alignment of IO buffer allocated from slab Message-ID: <20180921070805.GC14529@lst.de> References: <20180921015608.GA31060@dastard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180921015608.GA31060@dastard> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 11:56:08AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > > 3) If slab can't guarantee to return 512-aligned buffer, how to fix > > this data corruption issue? > > I think that the block layer needs to check the alignment of memory > buffers passed to it and take appropriate action rather than > corrupting random memory and returning a sucess status to the bad > bio. Or just reject the I/O. But yes, we already have the queue_dma_alignment helper in the block layer, we just don't do it in the fast path. I think generic_make_request_checks needs to check it, and print an error and return a warning if the alignment requirement isn't met.