From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from www.llwyncelyn.cymru ([82.70.14.225]:45292 "EHLO fuzix.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726377AbeIYWru (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Sep 2018 18:47:50 -0400 Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 17:39:21 +0100 From: Alan Cox To: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" Cc: Jeff Layton , =?UTF-8?B?54Sm5pmT5Yas?= , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rogier Wolff Subject: Re: POSIX violation by writeback error Message-ID: <20180925173921.3b267bb3@alans-desktop> In-Reply-To: <20180925154627.GC2933@thunk.org> References: <486f6105fd4076c1af67dae7fdfe6826019f7ff4.camel@redhat.com> <20180925003044.239531c7@alans-desktop> <0662a4c5d2e164d651a6a116d06da380f317100f.camel@redhat.com> <20180925154627.GC2933@thunk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > Unlike O_TMPFILE, this would require file system changes to support, > so maybe it's not worth having something which automatically cleans up > files that were in the middle of being written at the time of a system > crash. Would it. If you open a file unlink it and write to it and then have a linkf(fd, path); your underlying fs behaviour isn't really changed it's just you are allowed to name a file late ? Alan