From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>,
Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Darrick J . Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
xfs@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] block: move .dma_alignment into q->limits
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 16:29:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181018142900.GB26828@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181018131817.11813-3-ming.lei@redhat.com>
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 09:18:14PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> Turns out q->dma_alignement should be stack limit because now bvec table
> is immutalbe, the underlying queue's dma alignment has to be perceptible
> by stack driver, so IO buffer can be allocated as dma aligned before
> adding to bio.
>
> So this patch moves .dma_alignment into q->limits and prepares for
> making it as one stacked limit.
Looks fine:
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-18 22:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-18 13:18 [PATCH 0/5] block: introduce helpers for allocating io buffer from slab Ming Lei
2018-10-18 13:18 ` [PATCH 1/5] block: warn on un-aligned DMA IO buffer Ming Lei
2018-10-18 14:27 ` Jens Axboe
2018-10-18 14:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-18 14:46 ` Jens Axboe
2018-10-19 1:28 ` Ming Lei
2018-10-19 1:33 ` Jens Axboe
2018-10-19 1:39 ` Ming Lei
2018-10-19 1:52 ` Jens Axboe
2018-10-19 2:06 ` Ming Lei
2018-10-19 2:10 ` Jens Axboe
2018-10-18 14:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-18 13:18 ` [PATCH 2/5] block: move .dma_alignment into q->limits Ming Lei
2018-10-18 14:29 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2018-10-18 20:36 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-10-18 13:18 ` [PATCH 3/5] block: make dma_alignment as stacked limit Ming Lei
2018-10-18 14:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-18 13:18 ` [PATCH 4/5] block: introduce helpers for allocating IO buffers from slab Ming Lei
2018-10-18 14:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-18 15:11 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-10-18 15:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-19 2:53 ` Ming Lei
2018-10-19 4:06 ` Jens Axboe
2018-10-19 5:43 ` Dave Chinner
2018-10-18 13:18 ` [PATCH 5/5] xfs: use block layer helpers to allocate io buffer " Ming Lei
2018-10-18 14:03 ` [PATCH 0/5] block: introduce helpers for allocating " Matthew Wilcox
2018-10-18 14:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-18 15:06 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-10-18 15:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-18 15:50 ` Bart Van Assche
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181018142900.GB26828@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).