From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <stable-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 09:10:04 -0800
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
        linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
        stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dax: Don't access a freed inode
Message-ID: <20181128171004.GI10377@bombadil.infradead.org>
References: <20181127211634.4995-1-willy@infradead.org>
 <20181127211634.4995-3-willy@infradead.org>
 <20181128115330.GB15604@quack2.suse.cz>
 <CAPcyv4iqYNq1FMwU9W-oq+2mWGHotK=Ff9YvEyJOxRz3E+eDzQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAPcyv4iqYNq1FMwU9W-oq+2mWGHotK=Ff9YvEyJOxRz3E+eDzQ@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>

On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 09:08:40AM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> > Can we add a comment here like:
> >
> >         /*
> >          * Entry lock waits are exclusive. Wake up the next waiter since we
> >          * aren't sure we will acquire the entry lock and thus wake the
> >          * next waiter up on unlock.
> >          */
> >
> > Because I always wonder for a moment why this is needed.
> 
> Looks good, I'll add that when applying.

Thanks.