From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:49184 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726231AbeLKOlq (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Dec 2018 09:41:46 -0500 Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 09:41:40 -0500 From: Steven Rostedt To: Petr Mladek Cc: Matthew Wilcox , Kieran Bingham , Luis Chamberlain , Brendan Higgins , Kent Overstreet , Eryu Guan , Eric Sandeen , jeffm@suse.com, Sasha Levin , Greg KH , Kees Cook , shuah@kernel.org, Joel Stanley , mpe@ellerman.id.au, joe@perches.com, brakmo@fb.com, Tim.Bird@sony.com, khilman@baylibre.com, Julia Lawall , linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, Linux Kernel Mailing List , jdike@addtoit.com, richard@nod.at, linux-um@lists.infradead.org, Daniel Vetter , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Rob Herring , dan.j.williams@intel.com, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, Frank Rowand , Knut Omang , Felix Guo , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Linux Trace Devel Subject: Re: [RFC v3 11/19] kunit: add Python libraries for handing KUnit config and kernel Message-ID: <20181211094140.2a928fe7@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20181211140926.7wzd5jh6klcfsfgz@pathway.suse.cz> References: <20181128193636.254378-1-brendanhiggins@google.com> <20181128193636.254378-12-brendanhiggins@google.com> <841cf4ae-501b-05ae-5863-a51010709b67@ideasonboard.com> <20181204204701.GT28501@garbanzo.do-not-panic.com> <20181206153718.GD24603@bombadil.infradead.org> <20181211140926.7wzd5jh6klcfsfgz@pathway.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 15:09:26 +0100 Petr Mladek wrote: > > We have liburcu already, which is good. The main sticking points are: > > > > - printk has started adding a lot of %pX enhancements which printf > > obviously doesn't know about. > > I wonder how big problem it is and if it is worth using another > approach. No, please do not change the %pX approach. > > An alternative would be to replace them with helper functions > the would produce the same string. The meaning would be easier > to understand. But concatenating with the surrounding text > would be less elegant. People might start using pr_cont() > that is problematic (mixed lines). > > Also the %pX formats are mostly used to print context of some > structures. Even the helper functions would need some maintenance > to keep them compatible. > > BTW: The printk() feature has been introduced 10 years ago by > the commit 4d8a743cdd2690c0bc8 ("vsprintf: add infrastructure > support for extended '%p' specifiers"). trace-cmd and perf know about most of the %pX data and how to read it. Perhaps we can extend the libtraceevent library to export a generic way to read data from printk() output for other tools to use. -- Steve