From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Sandeep Patil <sspatil@android.com>
Cc: vbabka@suse.cz, adobriyan@gmail.com, avagin@openvz.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@android.com, dancol@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: proc: smaps_rollup: Fix pss_locked calculation
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 16:15:09 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190128161509.5085cacf939463f1c22e0550@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190121011049.160505-1-sspatil@android.com>
On Sun, 20 Jan 2019 17:10:49 -0800 Sandeep Patil <sspatil@android.com> wrote:
> The 'pss_locked' field of smaps_rollup was being calculated incorrectly
> as it accumulated the current pss everytime a locked VMA was found.
>
> Fix that by making sure we record the current pss value before each VMA
> is walked. So, we can only add the delta if the VMA was found to be
> VM_LOCKED.
>
> ...
>
> --- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> @@ -709,6 +709,7 @@ static void smap_gather_stats(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> #endif
> .mm = vma->vm_mm,
> };
> + unsigned long pss;
>
> smaps_walk.private = mss;
>
> @@ -737,11 +738,12 @@ static void smap_gather_stats(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> }
> }
> #endif
> -
> + /* record current pss so we can calculate the delta after page walk */
> + pss = mss->pss;
> /* mmap_sem is held in m_start */
> walk_page_vma(vma, &smaps_walk);
> if (vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED)
> - mss->pss_locked += mss->pss;
> + mss->pss_locked += mss->pss - pss;
> }
This seems to be a rather obscure way of accumulating
mem_size_stats.pss_locked. Wouldn't it make more sense to do this in
smaps_account(), wherever we increment mem_size_stats.pss?
It would be a tiny bit less efficient but I think that the code cleanup
justifies such a cost?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-29 0:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-21 1:10 [PATCH] mm: proc: smaps_rollup: Fix pss_locked calculation Sandeep Patil
[not found] ` <20190123225746.5B3DF218A4@mail.kernel.org>
2019-01-24 21:39 ` Sandeep Patil
2019-01-25 6:21 ` Greg KH
2019-01-29 0:15 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2019-01-29 15:52 ` Vlastimil Babka
2019-02-03 6:21 ` Sandeep Patil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190128161509.5085cacf939463f1c22e0550@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=avagin@openvz.org \
--cc=dancol@google.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=sspatil@android.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).