linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-aio <linux-aio@kvack.org>,
	syzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@scylladb.com>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] aio: Fix locking in aio_poll()
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2019 14:39:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190206133935.GA29185@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1549414384.34241.77.camel@acm.org>

On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 04:53:04PM -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> Could this be what happens?
> 
> aio_poll() calls vfs_poll()
>   vfs_poll() calls fuse_dev_poll()
>     fuse_dev_poll() calls poll_wait(file, &fiq->waitq, wait)
>       poll_wait() calls aio_poll_queue_proc(file, &fiq->waitq, wait)
>         aio_poll_queue_proc() stores &fiq->waitq in pt->iocb->poll.head
> aio_poll() calls spin_lock_irq(&ctx->ctx_lock)
> aio_poll() calls spin_lock(&req->head->lock) (req == &pt->iocb->poll).
> 
> I think the lockdep complaint is about the FUSE fiq->waitq lock not being
> IRQ-safe and about aio_poll() creating a dependency between an IRQ-safe lock
> (ctx->ctx_lock) and a lock that is not IRQ-safe (fiq->waitq).

That is exactly the scenario.  and the ->wake routine assumes irqs
are disabled - you really need to bypass the proper APIs to not have
the irqs disabled.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-02-06 13:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-04 17:45 [PATCH] aio: Fix locking in aio_poll() Bart Van Assche
2019-02-04 17:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-05  8:12   ` Miklos Szeredi
2019-02-06  0:53     ` Bart Van Assche
2019-02-06  8:36       ` Miklos Szeredi
2019-02-06 13:47         ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-06 14:31           ` Miklos Szeredi
2019-02-06 13:39       ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2019-02-09  0:59 Bart Van Assche
2019-02-12  7:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-21 22:28   ` Bart Van Assche
2019-02-22  3:17     ` Al Viro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190206133935.GA29185@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=avi@scylladb.com \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=linux-aio@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=syzkaller@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).