From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15E4FC282CB for ; Fri, 8 Feb 2019 22:33:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E304E21916 for ; Fri, 8 Feb 2019 22:33:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727132AbfBHWc5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Feb 2019 17:32:57 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:36912 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726788AbfBHWc5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Feb 2019 17:32:57 -0500 Received: from akpm3.svl.corp.google.com (unknown [104.133.8.65]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3AF65C36C; Fri, 8 Feb 2019 22:32:56 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2019 14:32:55 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: LKML , Waiman Long , Matthew Wilcox , Alexey Dobriyan , Kees Cook , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Davidlohr Bueso , Miklos Szeredi , Daniel Colascione , Dave Chinner , Randy Dunlap , Marc Zyngier Subject: Re: [patch V2 1/2] genriq: Avoid summation loops for /proc/stat Message-Id: <20190208143255.9dec696b15f03bf00f4c60c2@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20190208135020.925487496@linutronix.de> References: <20190208134802.218483159@linutronix.de> <20190208135020.925487496@linutronix.de> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.6.0 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 08 Feb 2019 14:48:03 +0100 Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Waiman reported that on large systems with a large amount of interrupts the > readout of /proc/stat takes a long time to sum up the interrupt > statistics. In principle this is not a problem. but for unknown reasons > some enterprise quality software reads /proc/stat with a high frequency. > > The reason for this is that interrupt statistics are accounted per cpu. So > the /proc/stat logic has to sum up the interrupt stats for each interrupt. > > This can be largely avoided for interrupts which are not marked as > 'PER_CPU' interrupts by simply adding a per interrupt summation counter > which is incremented along with the per interrupt per cpu counter. > > The PER_CPU interrupts need to avoid that and use only per cpu accounting > because they share the interrupt number and the interrupt descriptor and > concurrent updates would conflict or require unwanted synchronization. > > ... > > --- a/include/linux/irqdesc.h > +++ b/include/linux/irqdesc.h > @@ -65,6 +65,7 @@ struct irq_desc { > unsigned int core_internal_state__do_not_mess_with_it; > unsigned int depth; /* nested irq disables */ > unsigned int wake_depth; /* nested wake enables */ > + unsigned int tot_count; Confused. Isn't this going to quickly overflow?