linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	"Darrick J . Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
	"open list:XFS FILESYSTEM" <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com>,
	Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>, Christopher Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	linux-block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: allocate sector sized IO buffer via page_frag_alloc
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 05:02:30 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190226130230.GD11592@bombadil.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190226123545.GA6163@ming.t460p>

On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 08:35:46PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 04:12:09AM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 07:12:49PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > > The buffer needs to be device block size aligned for dio, and now the block
> > > size can be 512, 1024, 2048 and 4096.
> > 
> > Why does the block size make a difference?  This requirement is due to
> > some storage devices having shoddy DMA controllers.  Are you saying there
> > are devices which can't even do 512-byte aligned I/O?
> 
> Direct IO requires that, see do_blockdev_direct_IO().
> 
> This issue can be triggered when running xfs over loop/dio. We could
> fallback to buffered IO under this situation, but not sure it is the
> only case.

Wait, we're imposing a ridiculous amount of complexity on XFS for no
reason at all?  We should just change this to 512-byte alignment.  Tying
it to the blocksize of the device never made any sense.

  reply	other threads:[~2019-02-26 13:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-25  4:09 [PATCH] xfs: allocate sector sized IO buffer via page_frag_alloc Ming Lei
2019-02-25  4:36 ` Dave Chinner
2019-02-25  8:46   ` Ming Lei
2019-02-25 10:03     ` Ming Lei
2019-02-25 20:11     ` Dave Chinner
2019-02-25 13:15   ` Vlastimil Babka
2019-02-25 20:26     ` Dave Chinner
2019-02-26  2:22       ` Ming Lei
2019-02-26  3:02         ` Dave Chinner
2019-02-26  3:27           ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-02-26  4:58             ` Dave Chinner
2019-02-26  9:33               ` Ming Lei
2019-02-26 10:06                 ` Vlastimil Babka
2019-02-26 11:12                   ` Ming Lei
2019-02-26 12:12                     ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-02-26 12:35                       ` Ming Lei
2019-02-26 13:02                         ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2019-02-26 13:42                           ` Ming Lei
2019-02-26 14:04                             ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-02-26 16:14                               ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-02-26 16:19                                 ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-02-27  1:41                                   ` Ming Lei
2019-02-27  7:07                                   ` Vlastimil Babka
2019-03-08  8:18                                     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-27 21:38                                 ` Dave Chinner
2019-02-26 15:30                             ` Christopher Lameter
2019-02-26 20:45                 ` Dave Chinner
2019-02-27  1:50                   ` Ming Lei
2019-02-27  3:41                     ` Dave Chinner
2019-02-26 15:20     ` Christopher Lameter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190226130230.GD11592@bombadil.infradead.org \
    --to=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=aaron.lu@intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).