From: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
To: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Cc: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>,
containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
Linux-Audit Mailing List <linux-audit@redhat.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
sgrubb@redhat.com, omosnace@redhat.com, dhowells@redhat.com,
simo@redhat.com, Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org>,
Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>,
ebiederm@xmission.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH ghak90 V5 09/10] audit: add support for containerid to network namespaces
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 10:28:39 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190402142839.GC17593@hmswarspite.think-freely.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHC9VhRW86NamkX9FcsHEYg_DJehCCAnANUqB8+gv=dxpBkd6w@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 09:31:49AM -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 7:32 AM Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 10:50:03AM -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 2:35 PM Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > Audit events could happen in a network namespace outside of a task
> > > > context due to packets received from the net that trigger an auditing
> > > > rule prior to being associated with a running task. The network
> > > > namespace could be in use by multiple containers by association to the
> > > > tasks in that network namespace. We still want a way to attribute
> > > > these events to any potential containers. Keep a list per network
> > > > namespace to track these audit container identifiiers.
> > > >
> > > > Add/increment the audit container identifier on:
> > > > - initial setting of the audit container identifier via /proc
> > > > - clone/fork call that inherits an audit container identifier
> > > > - unshare call that inherits an audit container identifier
> > > > - setns call that inherits an audit container identifier
> > > > Delete/decrement the audit container identifier on:
> > > > - an inherited audit container identifier dropped when child set
> > > > - process exit
> > > > - unshare call that drops a net namespace
> > > > - setns call that drops a net namespace
> > > >
> > > > See: https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-kernel/issues/92
> > > > See: https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-testsuite/issues/64
> > > > See: https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-kernel/wiki/RFE-Audit-Container-ID
> > > > Signed-off-by: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > include/linux/audit.h | 19 ++++++++++++
> > > > kernel/audit.c | 86 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > > > kernel/nsproxy.c | 4 +++
> > > > 3 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > ...
> > >
> > > > diff --git a/kernel/audit.c b/kernel/audit.c
> > > > index cf448599ef34..7fa3194f5342 100644
> > > > --- a/kernel/audit.c
> > > > +++ b/kernel/audit.c
> > > > @@ -72,6 +72,7 @@
> > > > #include <linux/freezer.h>
> > > > #include <linux/pid_namespace.h>
> > > > #include <net/netns/generic.h>
> > > > +#include <net/net_namespace.h>
> > > >
> > > > #include "audit.h"
> > > >
> > > > @@ -99,9 +100,13 @@
> > > > /**
> > > > * struct audit_net - audit private network namespace data
> > > > * @sk: communication socket
> > > > + * @contid_list: audit container identifier list
> > > > + * @contid_list_lock audit container identifier list lock
> > > > */
> > > > struct audit_net {
> > > > struct sock *sk;
> > > > + struct list_head contid_list;
> > > > + spinlock_t contid_list_lock;
> > > > };
> > > >
> > > > /**
> > > > @@ -275,8 +280,11 @@ struct audit_task_info init_struct_audit = {
> > > > void audit_free(struct task_struct *tsk)
> > > > {
> > > > struct audit_task_info *info = tsk->audit;
> > > > + struct nsproxy *ns = tsk->nsproxy;
> > > >
> > > > audit_free_syscall(tsk);
> > > > + if (ns)
> > > > + audit_netns_contid_del(ns->net_ns, audit_get_contid(tsk));
> > > > /* Freeing the audit_task_info struct must be performed after
> > > > * audit_log_exit() due to need for loginuid and sessionid.
> > > > */
> > > > @@ -376,6 +384,73 @@ static struct sock *audit_get_sk(const struct net *net)
> > > > return aunet->sk;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > +void audit_netns_contid_add(struct net *net, u64 contid)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct audit_net *aunet = net_generic(net, audit_net_id);
> > > > + struct list_head *contid_list = &aunet->contid_list;
> > > > + struct audit_contid *cont;
> > > > +
> > > > + if (!audit_contid_valid(contid))
> > > > + return;
> > > > + if (!aunet)
> > > > + return;
> > >
> > > We should move the contid_list assignment below this check, or decide
> > > that aunet is always going to valid (?) and get rid of this check
> > > completely.
> > >
> > I'm not sure why that would be needed. Finding the net_id list is an operation
> > of a map relating net namespaces to lists, not contids to lists. We could do
> > it, sure, but since they're unrelated operations, I don't think we experience
> > any slowdowns from doing it this way.
>
> In the first line of the function, when aunet is declared, it is also
> assigned a value using net_generic():
>
> struct audit_net *aunet = net_generic(net, audit_net_id);
>
> Later in the function there is check to see if aunet is NULL, yet on
> the second line of the function (before the NULL check), there is this
> line of code:
>
> struct list_head *contid_list = &aunet->contid_list;
>
> ... which could result in the dereference of a NULL pointer if aunet
> is NULL. My suggestion was either to move this assignment below the
> aunet-NULL check or decide that aunet was always going to be valid
> (e.g. non-NULL) and do away with the aunet-NULL check completely.
> Richard has since replied that the aunet-NULL check has been
> demonstrated to be necessary so the proper thing to do would be to
> move the assignment. I believe that is what Richard is planning on
> doing.
>
oh, I'm sorry, you're right, I was looking at the contid tests not the list
tests.
Neil
> > > > + if (cont) {
> > > > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cont->list);
> > >
> > > Unless there is some guidance that INIT_LIST_HEAD() should be used
> > > regardless, you shouldn't need to call this here since list_add_rcu()
> > > will take care of any list.h related initialization.
> >
> > There is a corner case that needs it. list_add_rcu has a check that gets
> > called, __list_add_valid. Its a noop in the regular case, but if
> > CONFIG_DEBUG_LIST is defined, its a check to ensure that the next and prev
> > pointers getting passed in aren't set to detectable corrupt values. If we pass
> > in garbage, we can get transient false positives on that check, so we need to
> > set the list pointers to known good values before hand, either by using kzalloc,
> > or INIT_LIST_HEAD, as has been done here. Given that we expressly set every
> > field of this structure, I think this is the right approach, as it uses the list
> > macro to expressly set the list values to their proper state.
>
> Good to know, thanks.
>
> --
> paul moore
> www.paul-moore.com
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-02 14:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-15 18:29 [PATCH ghak90 V5 00/10] audit: implement container identifier Richard Guy Briggs
2019-03-15 18:29 ` [PATCH ghak90 V5 01/10] audit: collect audit task parameters Richard Guy Briggs
2019-03-16 19:57 ` Neil Horman
2019-03-27 20:33 ` Ondrej Mosnacek
2019-03-15 18:29 ` [PATCH ghak90 V5 02/10] audit: add container id Richard Guy Briggs
2019-03-16 20:00 ` Neil Horman
2019-03-27 20:38 ` Ondrej Mosnacek
2019-03-27 20:44 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2019-03-15 18:29 ` [PATCH ghak90 V5 03/10] audit: read container ID of a process Richard Guy Briggs
2019-03-18 11:10 ` Neil Horman
2019-03-18 18:17 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2019-03-18 18:48 ` Neil Horman
2019-03-18 18:54 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2019-03-27 20:44 ` Ondrej Mosnacek
2019-03-15 18:29 ` [PATCH ghak90 V5 04/10] audit: log container info of syscalls Richard Guy Briggs
2019-03-16 22:44 ` Neil Horman
2019-03-27 21:01 ` Ondrej Mosnacek
2019-03-27 22:10 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2019-03-15 18:29 ` [PATCH ghak90 V5 05/10] audit: add containerid support for ptrace and signals Richard Guy Briggs
2019-03-18 19:04 ` Neil Horman
2019-03-18 19:29 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2019-03-27 21:17 ` Ondrej Mosnacek
2019-03-28 2:04 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2019-03-30 12:55 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2019-03-15 18:29 ` [PATCH ghak90 V5 06/10] audit: add support for non-syscall auxiliary records Richard Guy Briggs
2019-03-18 19:34 ` Neil Horman
2019-03-27 21:22 ` Ondrej Mosnacek
2019-04-01 14:49 ` Paul Moore
2019-04-01 17:44 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2019-04-01 18:57 ` Paul Moore
2019-04-01 20:43 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2019-03-15 18:29 ` [PATCH ghak90 V5 07/10] audit: add containerid support for user records Richard Guy Briggs
2019-03-18 19:41 ` Neil Horman
2019-03-27 21:30 ` Ondrej Mosnacek
2019-03-15 18:29 ` [PATCH ghak90 V5 08/10] audit: add containerid filtering Richard Guy Briggs
2019-03-18 20:02 ` Ondrej Mosnacek
2019-03-18 23:47 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2019-03-27 21:41 ` Ondrej Mosnacek
2019-03-27 22:00 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2019-03-18 20:39 ` Neil Horman
2019-03-15 18:29 ` [PATCH ghak90 V5 09/10] audit: add support for containerid to network namespaces Richard Guy Briggs
2019-03-18 20:56 ` Neil Horman
2019-03-27 22:42 ` Ondrej Mosnacek
2019-03-28 1:12 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2019-03-28 8:01 ` Ondrej Mosnacek
2019-03-28 15:46 ` Paul Moore
2019-03-28 21:40 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2019-03-28 22:00 ` Paul Moore
2019-03-31 2:11 ` Neil Horman
2019-03-29 14:50 ` Neil Horman
2019-03-29 14:49 ` Neil Horman
2019-04-01 14:50 ` Paul Moore
2019-04-01 20:41 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2019-04-02 11:31 ` Neil Horman
2019-04-02 13:31 ` Paul Moore
2019-04-02 14:28 ` Neil Horman [this message]
2019-04-04 21:40 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2019-04-05 2:06 ` Paul Moore
2019-04-05 11:32 ` Neil Horman
2019-03-15 18:29 ` [PATCH ghak90 V5 10/10] audit: NETFILTER_PKT: record each container ID associated with a netNS Richard Guy Briggs
2019-03-18 20:58 ` Neil Horman
2019-03-27 22:52 ` Ondrej Mosnacek
2019-04-01 14:50 ` Paul Moore
2019-04-01 17:50 ` Richard Guy Briggs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190402142839.GC17593@hmswarspite.think-freely.org \
--to=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=eparis@parisplace.org \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=omosnace@redhat.com \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=rgb@redhat.com \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=sgrubb@redhat.com \
--cc=simo@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).