linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>,
	"Darrick J . Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [POC][PATCH] xfs: reduce ilock contention on buffered randrw workload
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 11:11:17 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190411011117.GC29573@dread.disaster.area> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1554741429.3326.43.camel@suse.com>

On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 09:37:09AM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-04-08 at 12:33 +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > On Fri 05-04-19 08:17:30, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > FYI, I'm working on a range lock implementation that should both
> > > solve the performance issue and the reader starvation issue at the
> > > same time by allowing concurrent buffered reads and writes to
> > > different file ranges.
> > 
> > Are you aware of range locks Davidlohr has implemented [1]? It didn't get
> > merged because he had no in-tree user at the time (he was more aiming at
> > converting mmap_sem which is rather difficult). But the generic lock
> > implementation should be well usable.
> > 
> > Added Davidlohr to CC.
> > 
> > 								Honza
> > 
> > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/3/7/22
> 
> fyi this was the latest version (had some naming updates per peterz).
> 
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/2/4/232

No, I wasn't aware of these because they haven't ever been posted to
a list I subscribe to and they haven't been merged. I'll go have a
look at them over the next few days.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

  reply	other threads:[~2019-04-11  1:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-04 16:57 Amir Goldstein
2019-04-04 21:17 ` Dave Chinner
2019-04-05 14:02   ` Amir Goldstein
2019-04-07 23:27     ` Dave Chinner
2019-04-08  9:02       ` Amir Goldstein
2019-04-08 14:11         ` Jan Kara
2019-04-08 17:41           ` Amir Goldstein
2019-04-09  8:26             ` Jan Kara
2019-04-08 11:03       ` Jan Kara
2019-04-22 10:55         ` Boaz Harrosh
2019-04-08 10:33   ` Jan Kara
2019-04-08 16:37     ` Davidlohr Bueso
2019-04-11  1:11       ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2019-04-16 12:22         ` Dave Chinner
2019-04-18  3:10           ` Dave Chinner
2019-04-18 18:21             ` Davidlohr Bueso
2019-04-20 23:54               ` Dave Chinner
2019-05-03  4:17                 ` Dave Chinner
2019-05-03  5:17                   ` Dave Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190411011117.GC29573@dread.disaster.area \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=dbueso@suse.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --subject='Re: [POC][PATCH] xfs: reduce ilock contention on buffered randrw workload' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).