From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu,
adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, ebiggers@kernel.org,
jaegeuk@kernel.org, yuchao0@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 02/14] Consolidate "post read processing" into a new file
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 07:24:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190424142423.GA12761@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6353008.fQNhCuxumZ@localhost.localdomain>
On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 03:34:17PM +0530, Chandan Rajendra wrote:
> To clarify, Are you suggesting that a new kconfig option (say
> CONFIG_FS_READ_CALLBACKS) be provided to the user so that the following could
> occur,
>
> 1. User selects CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION and/or CONFIG_FS_VERITY and this causes
> CONFIG_FS_READ_CALLBACKS to be set to 'y'.
> 2. User selects CONFIG_FS_READ_CALLBACKS explicitly.
If you don't add a user description to a Kconfig entry it won't be
visible to users, but only selectable by other options. That is what
I suggest.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-24 14:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-24 4:37 [PATCH V1 00/14] Consolidate Post read processing code Chandan Rajendra
2019-04-24 4:37 ` [PATCH V1 01/14] ext4: Clear BH_Uptodate flag on decryption error Chandan Rajendra
2019-04-24 4:37 ` [PATCH V1 02/14] Consolidate "post read processing" into a new file Chandan Rajendra
2019-04-24 5:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-24 10:04 ` Chandan Rajendra
2019-04-24 14:24 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2019-04-24 14:59 ` Chandan Rajendra
2019-04-24 8:31 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2019-04-24 11:01 ` Chandan Rajendra
2019-04-24 12:06 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2019-04-24 14:49 ` Chandan Rajendra
2019-04-24 4:37 ` [PATCH V1 03/14] fsverity: Add call back to decide if verity check has to be performed Chandan Rajendra
2019-04-24 4:37 ` [PATCH V1 04/14] fsverity: Add call back to determine readpage limit Chandan Rajendra
2019-04-24 4:37 ` [PATCH V1 05/14] fs/mpage.c: Integrate post read processing Chandan Rajendra
2019-04-24 4:37 ` [PATCH V1 06/14] ext4: Wire up ext4_readpage[s] to use mpage_readpage[s] Chandan Rajendra
2019-04-24 4:37 ` [PATCH V1 07/14] Remove the term "bio" from post read processing Chandan Rajendra
2019-04-24 4:37 ` [PATCH V1 08/14] Add decryption support for sub-pagesized blocks Chandan Rajendra
2019-04-24 4:37 ` [PATCH V1 09/14] ext4: Decrypt all boundary blocks when doing buffered write Chandan Rajendra
2019-04-24 4:37 ` [PATCH V1 10/14] ext4: Decrypt the block that needs to be partially zeroed Chandan Rajendra
2019-04-24 4:37 ` [PATCH V1 11/14] fscrypt_encrypt_page: Loop across all blocks mapped by a page range Chandan Rajendra
2019-04-24 4:37 ` [PATCH V1 12/14] ext4: Compute logical block and the page range to be encrypted Chandan Rajendra
2019-04-24 4:37 ` [PATCH V1 13/14] fscrypt_zeroout_range: Encrypt all zeroed out blocks of a page Chandan Rajendra
2019-04-24 4:37 ` [PATCH V1 14/14] ext4: Enable encryption for subpage-sized blocks Chandan Rajendra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190424142423.GA12761@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=chandan@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=yuchao0@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).