From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C8F1C282CE for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 18:04:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2456120652 for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 18:04:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1556129056; bh=HAKvslxGkZt125Kb74Dv+T/bw9ZprP7fnMsbEuV8Sc8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=0FazBZI2MOadhh/NY4iEOkqZ9qB6GeDYg9P/Da2WCSftvQk2CNiOfTGqXyovRZfGS ePLecNNhhn6JyPuMx4DWOzF05zQ99aZKhkFhDfW7+uAYFH/z4DgZUBJgaSdGWm0WKc Ds4cPyY3V2dI1A1Q23srPpIuOFyuQAFmTM2JTRDQ= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2389008AbfDXRTb (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Apr 2019 13:19:31 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:44716 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2388994AbfDXRT2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Apr 2019 13:19:28 -0400 Received: from localhost (c-73-47-72-35.hsd1.nh.comcast.net [73.47.72.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A4CB821909; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 17:19:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1556126367; bh=HAKvslxGkZt125Kb74Dv+T/bw9ZprP7fnMsbEuV8Sc8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=EK03smXYTgkQDEaLQlm2wQ/9kRiw5SDHIPbjw1MjaIbckFGiO1wGXH2pPBmcMq70f rs98bEyCLrcG1+yQ5gCecj2ygUs0eUJ5f23r6Ci5RxaSkbyM9fNZCogekR7yPMfiT6 El1O4+IxUildOBH9gxUhiEJnXQ2rUmYYCZRqR5c8= Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 13:19:26 -0400 From: Sasha Levin To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Linux List Kernel Mailing , stable , Kirill Smelkov , Michael Kerrisk , Yongzhi Pan , Jonathan Corbet , David Vrabel , Juergen Gross , Miklos Szeredi , Tejun Heo , Kirill Tkhai , Arnd Bergmann , Christoph Hellwig , Julia Lawall , Nikolaus Rath , Han-Wen Nienhuys , linux-fsdevel Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.0 59/66] fs: stream_open - opener for stream-like files so that read and write can run simultaneously without deadlock Message-ID: <20190424171926.GA17719@sasha-vm> References: <20190424143341.27665-1-sashal@kernel.org> <20190424143341.27665-59-sashal@kernel.org> <20190424163415.GB21413@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 09:40:53AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: >On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 9:34 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman > wrote: >> >> I think there is a follow-on patch for this one as well, that adds the >> proper "stream open" logic to all of the individual locations. > >That bulk one hasn't been applied yet, and wouldn't be appropriate for >stable anyway. It's 5.2 material. Hm, I might be confusing something here but I see a bunch of patches that convert existing callers mentioned in this patch to use stream_open() which was introduced here. Are these the same patches you're referring to? If so, why are they not appropriate for stable? -- Thanks, Sasha