From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE3EEC004C9 for ; Tue, 7 May 2019 17:14:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD1D52054F for ; Tue, 7 May 2019 17:14:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1557249243; bh=FKPYiaoR8KZoQNxUjndvOR95F/ZO5wjILQJE3WvJ030=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=rRlSB66dX5BD975f52X7lkt7W7qJGGNENV1pZLTM0lsNV2IKrI0kog/iGv4YhPuX0 9sbRKcYFEheeAWui1Ka85HDXO4mNqykwnQ9TxczXIecQSy6817G0K/I25xkyrF1iuT EDkUclWdf/ZGqEMy9Ppwre24Ku08T21JVivQAZZA= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726681AbfEGROD (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 May 2019 13:14:03 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:34302 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726225AbfEGROD (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 May 2019 13:14:03 -0400 Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E1E772053B; Tue, 7 May 2019 17:14:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1557249242; bh=FKPYiaoR8KZoQNxUjndvOR95F/ZO5wjILQJE3WvJ030=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=vcDUCGRMRaayeNiHCHHcMha9/T7wiVZ/QmBKmFfoSoZiVPbVjUrlWfJ2KjAzt3KO2 LW/cbeH6Ihpezbz+BmLQX9An+mqwWzNkK5WaO7X9TpcaPcjXLJ5rgMOrm+Xi/17z2m b4n0LXGLUIINs+gtKhxxYXno4/5FWZ4zydqaccLY= Date: Tue, 7 May 2019 19:13:59 +0200 From: Greg KH To: ezemtsov@google.com Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] incfs: Add first files of incrementalfs Message-ID: <20190507171359.GA5885@kroah.com> References: <20190502040331.81196-1-ezemtsov@google.com> <20190502040331.81196-2-ezemtsov@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190502040331.81196-2-ezemtsov@google.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.4 (2019-03-13) Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 01, 2019 at 09:03:26PM -0700, ezemtsov@google.com wrote: > +Sysfs files > +----------- > +``/sys/fs/incremental-fs/version`` - a current version of the filesystem. > +One ASCII encoded positive integer number with a new line at the end. sysfs (no "S" please) documentation goes in Documentation/ABI/, not burried in a random file somewhere else :) Also, "filesystem version" does not make much sense, does it? Why does userspace care about this, all they really care about is the _kernel_ version. We do not independantly version the individual components of the kernel, that way lies madness. thanks, greg k-h