From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
linux-block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
keyrings@vger.kernel.org,
LSM List <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] Mount, FS, Block and Keyrings notifications
Date: Thu, 30 May 2019 13:00:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190530110024.GB29237@quack2.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOQ4uxjLzURf8c1UH_xCJKkuD2es8i-=P-ZNM=t3aFcZLMwXEg@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed 29-05-19 18:53:21, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> > > David,
> > >
> > > I am interested to know how you envision filesystem notifications would
> > > look with this interface.
> > >
> > > fanotify can certainly benefit from providing a ring buffer interface to read
> > > events.
> > >
> > > From what I have seen, a common practice of users is to monitor mounts
> > > (somehow) and place FAN_MARK_MOUNT fanotify watches dynamically.
> > > It'd be good if those users can use a single watch mechanism/API for
> > > watching the mount namespace and filesystem events within mounts.
> > >
> > > A similar usability concern is with sb_notify and FAN_MARK_FILESYSTEM.
> > > It provides users with two complete different mechanisms to watch error
> > > and filesystem events. That is generally not a good thing to have.
> > >
> > > I am not asking that you implement fs_notify() before merging sb_notify()
> > > and I understand that you have a use case for sb_notify().
> > > I am asking that you show me the path towards a unified API (how a
> > > typical program would look like), so that we know before merging your
> > > new API that it could be extended to accommodate fsnotify events
> > > where the final result will look wholesome to users.
> >
> > Are you sure we want to combine notification about file changes etc. with
> > administrator-type notifications about the filesystem? To me these two
> > sound like rather different (although sometimes related) things.
> >
>
> Well I am sure that ring buffer for fanotify events would be useful, so
> seeing that David is proposing a generic notification mechanism, I wanted
> to know how that mechanism could best share infrastructure with fsnotify.
>
> But apart from that I foresee the questions from users about why the
> mount notification API and filesystem events API do not have better
> integration.
>
> The way I see it, the notification queue can serve several classes
> of notifications and fsnotify could be one of those classes
> (at least FAN_CLASS_NOTIF fits nicely to the model).
I agree that for some type of fsnotify uses a ring buffer would make sense.
But for others - such as permission events or unlimited queues - you cannot
really use the ring buffer and I don't like the idea of having different
ways of passing fsnotify events to userspace based on notification group
type...
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-30 11:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-28 16:01 [RFC][PATCH 0/7] Mount, FS, Block and Keyrings notifications David Howells
2019-05-28 16:01 ` [PATCH 1/7] General notification queue with user mmap()'able ring buffer David Howells
2019-05-28 16:26 ` Greg KH
2019-05-28 17:30 ` David Howells
2019-05-28 23:12 ` Greg KH
2019-05-29 16:06 ` David Howells
2019-05-29 17:46 ` Jann Horn
2019-05-29 21:02 ` David Howells
2019-05-31 11:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-31 12:02 ` David Howells
2019-05-31 13:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-31 14:20 ` David Howells
2019-05-31 16:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-31 17:12 ` David Howells
2019-06-17 16:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-29 23:09 ` Greg KH
2019-05-29 23:11 ` Greg KH
2019-05-30 9:50 ` Andrea Parri
2019-05-31 8:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-31 8:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-31 12:42 ` David Howells
2019-05-31 14:55 ` David Howells
2019-05-28 19:14 ` Jann Horn
2019-05-28 22:28 ` David Howells
2019-05-28 23:16 ` Jann Horn
2019-05-28 16:02 ` [PATCH 2/7] keys: Add a notification facility David Howells
2019-05-28 16:02 ` [PATCH 3/7] vfs: Add a mount-notification facility David Howells
2019-05-28 20:06 ` Jann Horn
2019-05-28 23:04 ` David Howells
2019-05-28 23:23 ` Jann Horn
2019-05-29 11:16 ` David Howells
2019-05-28 23:08 ` David Howells
2019-05-29 10:55 ` David Howells
2019-05-29 11:00 ` David Howells
2019-05-29 15:53 ` Casey Schaufler
2019-05-29 16:12 ` Jann Horn
2019-05-29 17:04 ` Casey Schaufler
2019-06-03 16:30 ` David Howells
2019-05-29 17:13 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-05-29 17:46 ` Casey Schaufler
2019-05-29 18:11 ` Jann Horn
2019-05-29 19:28 ` Casey Schaufler
2019-05-29 19:47 ` Jann Horn
2019-05-29 20:50 ` Casey Schaufler
2019-05-29 23:12 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-05-29 23:56 ` Casey Schaufler
2019-05-28 16:02 ` [PATCH 4/7] vfs: Add superblock notifications David Howells
2019-05-28 20:27 ` Jann Horn
2019-05-29 12:58 ` David Howells
2019-05-29 14:16 ` Jann Horn
2019-05-28 16:02 ` [PATCH 5/7] fsinfo: Export superblock notification counter David Howells
2019-05-28 16:02 ` [PATCH 6/7] block: Add block layer notifications David Howells
2019-05-28 20:37 ` Jann Horn
2019-05-28 16:02 ` [PATCH 7/7] Add sample notification program David Howells
2019-05-28 23:58 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/7] Mount, FS, Block and Keyrings notifications Greg KH
2019-05-29 6:33 ` Amir Goldstein
2019-05-29 14:25 ` Jan Kara
2019-05-29 15:10 ` Greg KH
2019-05-29 15:53 ` Amir Goldstein
2019-05-30 11:00 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2019-06-04 12:33 ` David Howells
2019-05-29 6:45 ` David Howells
2019-05-29 7:40 ` Amir Goldstein
2019-05-29 9:09 ` David Howells
2019-05-29 15:41 ` Casey Schaufler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190530110024.GB29237@quack2.suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=raven@themaw.net \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).