From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 976C7C28CC0 for ; Thu, 30 May 2019 16:14:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7687823A85 for ; Thu, 30 May 2019 16:14:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726355AbfE3QN7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 May 2019 12:13:59 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:35566 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725934AbfE3QN7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 May 2019 12:13:59 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F2A6C057E7D; Thu, 30 May 2019 16:13:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dhcp-27-174.brq.redhat.com (unknown [10.43.17.159]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with SMTP id D84D75C22E; Thu, 30 May 2019 16:13:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by dhcp-27-174.brq.redhat.com (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1000 oleg@redhat.com; Thu, 30 May 2019 18:13:53 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 30 May 2019 18:13:48 +0200 From: Oleg Nesterov To: David Laight Cc: "'Eric W. Biederman'" , Deepa Dinamani , Al Viro , Linus Torvalds , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "akpm@linux-foundation.org" , "arnd@arndb.de" , "dbueso@suse.de" , "axboe@kernel.dk" , "dave@stgolabs.net" , "e@80x24.org" , "jbaron@akamai.com" , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-aio@kvack.org" , "omar.kilani@gmail.com" , "tglx@linutronix.de" , "stable@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: pselect/etc semantics Message-ID: <20190530161348.GJ22536@redhat.com> References: <20190522032144.10995-1-deepa.kernel@gmail.com> <20190529161157.GA27659@redhat.com> <87woi8rt96.fsf@xmission.com> <9150b8cb8123426492a82e193f45229e@AcuMS.aculab.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9150b8cb8123426492a82e193f45229e@AcuMS.aculab.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.32]); Thu, 30 May 2019 16:13:59 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On 05/30, David Laight wrote: > > 4) As an optimisation a signal that arrives after the timer > expires, but before the mask is restored can be 'deemed' > to have happened before the timeout expired and EINTR > returned. This is what pselect/ppoll already does. Oleg.