From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80F9BC48BD5 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 10:06:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63F9E21655 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 10:06:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727168AbfFYKGi (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jun 2019 06:06:38 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:33380 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726274AbfFYKGi (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jun 2019 06:06:38 -0400 Received: by newverein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id C6FDC68B05; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 12:06:06 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 12:06:06 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Christoph Hellwig , "Darrick J . Wong" , Damien Le Moal , Andreas Gruenbacher , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/12] list.h: add a list_pop helper Message-ID: <20190625100606.GF1462@lst.de> References: <20190624055253.31183-1-hch@lst.de> <20190624055253.31183-2-hch@lst.de> <20190624155137.GO32656@bombadil.infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190624155137.GO32656@bombadil.infradead.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 08:51:37AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > The usual convention in list.h is that list_foo uses the list head and > list_foo_entry uses the container type. So I think this should be > renamed to list_pop_entry() at least. Do we also want: > > static inline struct list_head *list_pop(struct list_head *head) > { > struct list_head *first = READ_ONCE(head->next); > > if (first == head) > return NULL; > __list_del(head, first->next); > return first; > } > > we also seem to prefer using inline functions over #defines in this > header file. Sure, I can rename it and split the implementation.