From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBF54C3A589 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 07:17:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D36A214DA for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 07:17:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729341AbfHTHR2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Aug 2019 03:17:28 -0400 Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.188]:3971 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726049AbfHTHR2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Aug 2019 03:17:28 -0400 Received: from DGGEMM405-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.54]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 5C1EF788C0609428E3B8; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 15:17:23 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggeme762-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.108) by DGGEMM405-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.20.213) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.439.0; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 15:17:22 +0800 Received: from architecture4 (10.140.130.215) by dggeme762-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.108) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1591.10; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 15:17:22 +0800 Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 15:16:45 +0800 From: Gao Xiang To: "Li, Philip" CC: Gao Xiang , lkp , "kbuild-all@01.org" , "devel@driverdev.osuosl.org" , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org" , LKML , "stable@vger.kernel.org" , Fang Wei , Miao Xie Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: erofs: fix an error handling in erofs_readdir() Message-ID: <20190820071645.GH159846@architecture4> References: <20190818031855.9723-1-hsiangkao@aol.com> <201908182116.RRufKUpl%lkp@intel.com> <20190818132503.GA26232@hsiangkao-HP-ZHAN-66-Pro-G1> <20190820065038.GG4479@intel.com> <20190820065010.GG159846@architecture4> <831EE4E5E37DCC428EB295A351E66249520C70FE@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <831EE4E5E37DCC428EB295A351E66249520C70FE@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-Originating-IP: [10.140.130.215] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggeme703-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.199.99) To dggeme762-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.108) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 06:58:00AM +0000, Li, Philip wrote: > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: erofs: fix an error handling in erofs_readdir() > > > > Hi Philip, > > > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 02:50:38PM +0800, Philip Li wrote: > > > On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 09:25:04PM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote: > > > > On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 09:17:52PM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote: > > > > > Hi Gao, > > > > > > > > > > I love your patch! Yet something to improve: > > > > > > > > > > [auto build test ERROR on linus/master] > > > > > [cannot apply to v5.3-rc4 next-20190816] > > > > > [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help > > improve the system] > > > > > > > > ... those patches should be applied to staging tree > > > > since linux-next has not been updated yet... > > > thanks for the feedback, we will consider this to our todo list. > > > > Yes, many confusing reports anyway... > > (Just my personal suggestion, maybe we can add some hints on the patch email > > to indicate which tree can be applied successfully for ci in the future...) > thanks, this is good idea. On the other side, we support to add --base option to git format-patch > to automatically suggest the base, refer to https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982 for detail. Thanks for your information :) It seems a new patch format, I will take a try later. Thanks, Gao Xiang > Meanwhile, we will enhance the internal logic to find suitable base if possible. > > > > > Thanks, > > Gao Xiang > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Gao Xiang > > > > > > > > > > > > > > url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Gao-Xiang/staging-erofs-fix- > > an-error-handling-in-erofs_readdir/20190818-191344 > > > > > config: arm64-allyesconfig (attached as .config) > > > > > compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 7.4.0 > > > > > reproduce: > > > > > wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp- > > tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross > > > > > chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross > > > > > # save the attached .config to linux build tree > > > > > GCC_VERSION=7.4.0 make.cross ARCH=arm64 > > > > > > > > > > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag > > > > > Reported-by: kbuild test robot > > > > > > > > > > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): > > > > > > > > > > drivers/staging/erofs/dir.c: In function 'erofs_readdir': > > > > > >> drivers/staging/erofs/dir.c:110:11: error: 'EFSCORRUPTED' undeclared > > (first use in this function); did you mean 'FS_NRSUPER'? > > > > > err = -EFSCORRUPTED; > > > > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > > > FS_NRSUPER > > > > > drivers/staging/erofs/dir.c:110:11: note: each undeclared identifier is > > reported only once for each function it appears in > > > > > > > > > > vim +110 drivers/staging/erofs/dir.c > > > > > > > > > > 85 > > > > > 86 static int erofs_readdir(struct file *f, struct dir_context *ctx) > > > > > 87 { > > > > > 88 struct inode *dir = file_inode(f); > > > > > 89 struct address_space *mapping = dir->i_mapping; > > > > > 90 const size_t dirsize = i_size_read(dir); > > > > > 91 unsigned int i = ctx->pos / EROFS_BLKSIZ; > > > > > 92 unsigned int ofs = ctx->pos % EROFS_BLKSIZ; > > > > > 93 int err = 0; > > > > > 94 bool initial = true; > > > > > 95 > > > > > 96 while (ctx->pos < dirsize) { > > > > > 97 struct page *dentry_page; > > > > > 98 struct erofs_dirent *de; > > > > > 99 unsigned int nameoff, maxsize; > > > > > 100 > > > > > 101 dentry_page = read_mapping_page(mapping, i, > > NULL); > > > > > 102 if (dentry_page == ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM)) { > > > > > 103 errln("no memory to readdir of logical > > block %u of nid %llu", > > > > > 104 i, EROFS_V(dir)->nid); > > > > > 105 err = -ENOMEM; > > > > > 106 break; > > > > > 107 } else if (IS_ERR(dentry_page)) { > > > > > 108 errln("fail to readdir of logical block %u of > > nid %llu", > > > > > 109 i, EROFS_V(dir)->nid); > > > > > > 110 err = -EFSCORRUPTED; > > > > > 111 break; > > > > > 112 } > > > > > 113 > > > > > 114 de = (struct erofs_dirent *)kmap(dentry_page); > > > > > 115 > > > > > 116 nameoff = le16_to_cpu(de->nameoff); > > > > > 117 > > > > > 118 if (unlikely(nameoff < sizeof(struct erofs_dirent) || > > > > > 119 nameoff >= PAGE_SIZE)) { > > > > > 120 errln("%s, invalid de[0].nameoff %u", > > > > > 121 __func__, nameoff); > > > > > 122 > > > > > 123 err = -EIO; > > > > > 124 goto skip_this; > > > > > 125 } > > > > > 126 > > > > > 127 maxsize = min_t(unsigned int, > > > > > 128 dirsize - ctx->pos + ofs, > > PAGE_SIZE); > > > > > 129 > > > > > 130 /* search dirents at the arbitrary position */ > > > > > 131 if (unlikely(initial)) { > > > > > 132 initial = false; > > > > > 133 > > > > > 134 ofs = roundup(ofs, sizeof(struct > > erofs_dirent)); > > > > > 135 if (unlikely(ofs >= nameoff)) > > > > > 136 goto skip_this; > > > > > 137 } > > > > > 138 > > > > > 139 err = erofs_fill_dentries(ctx, de, &ofs, nameoff, > > maxsize); > > > > > 140 skip_this: > > > > > 141 kunmap(dentry_page); > > > > > 142 > > > > > 143 put_page(dentry_page); > > > > > 144 > > > > > 145 ctx->pos = blknr_to_addr(i) + ofs; > > > > > 146 > > > > > 147 if (unlikely(err)) > > > > > 148 break; > > > > > 149 ++i; > > > > > 150 ofs = 0; > > > > > 151 } > > > > > 152 return err < 0 ? err : 0; > > > > > 153 } > > > > > 154 > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center > > > > > https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation > > > > > > > >