From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42C76C3A5A4 for ; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 08:36:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14501239B7 for ; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 08:36:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=oracle.com header.i=@oracle.com header.b="DOBICrS+" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727741AbfH3IgA (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Aug 2019 04:36:00 -0400 Received: from userp2120.oracle.com ([156.151.31.85]:35952 "EHLO userp2120.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727426AbfH3IgA (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Aug 2019 04:36:00 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (userp2120.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp2120.oracle.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x7U8Y1Q7157966; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 08:35:00 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=date : from : to : cc : subject : message-id : references : mime-version : content-type : in-reply-to; s=corp-2019-08-05; bh=5qQDKREBIOpHdjcAhX41kOtTEKTT3PXvNeLkBeWr4GA=; b=DOBICrS+B9+nyFrqwktq0ryaroZKDA4Aep2xBK1TDM5+z5c6fMjptnDvB7CUNbtVbprJ mp3QngjZFhyO/F4qxi+dAogd8t95pI2MBDUInDKOL2fzUH5NsoptABZrOwh4SPnxFhK/ vX1zpV+Plarl+TMJ2xtEk1vMBiBeQFdJxY6Sm3M5EDACU1Xp+ee0PZ/qJ6xIkeWjZr0b TreacrSB+0XSv63gvHjiVT5HNGk4jRZwsgOZ2YlhXVT4l0Qq0xd4kPNyi09CVvyCESRi dhOgmH6qR+Wlw5Y5ayOYnqQ3dUDVVdxVHMWhzO01oFtt1atDFdT+mUkAMCnI1xkuYB/n lg== Received: from aserp3020.oracle.com (aserp3020.oracle.com [141.146.126.70]) by userp2120.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2uq009g5pj-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 30 Aug 2019 08:35:00 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (aserp3020.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp3020.oracle.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x7U8Xlk6004822; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 08:35:00 GMT Received: from aserv0122.oracle.com (aserv0122.oracle.com [141.146.126.236]) by aserp3020.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2upc8x6487-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 30 Aug 2019 08:34:59 +0000 Received: from abhmp0003.oracle.com (abhmp0003.oracle.com [141.146.116.9]) by aserv0122.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x7U8Yrwu012117; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 08:34:53 GMT Received: from kadam (/41.57.98.10) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 01:34:53 -0700 Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 11:34:45 +0300 From: Dan Carpenter To: Gao Xiang Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, Christoph Hellwig , Valdis =?utf-8?Q?Kl=C4=93tnieks?= , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sasha Levin , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, OGAWA Hirofumi Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: exfat: add exfat filesystem code to staging Message-ID: <20190830083445.GL23584@kadam> References: <20190829063955.GA30193@kroah.com> <20190829094136.GA28643@infradead.org> <20190829095019.GA13557@kroah.com> <20190829103749.GA13661@infradead.org> <20190829111810.GA23393@kroah.com> <20190829151144.GJ23584@kadam> <20190829152757.GA125003@architecture4> <20190829154346.GK23584@kadam> <20190829155127.GA136563@architecture4> <20190829160441.GA141079@architecture4> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190829160441.GA141079@architecture4> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9364 signatures=668685 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1906280000 definitions=main-1908300092 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9364 signatures=668685 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1906280000 definitions=main-1908300092 Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 12:04:41AM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote: > Anyway, I'm fine to delete them all if you like, but I think majority of these > are meaningful. > > data.c- /* page is already locked */ > data.c- DBG_BUGON(PageUptodate(page)); > data.c- > data.c: if (unlikely(err)) > data.c- SetPageError(page); > data.c- else > data.c- SetPageUptodate(page); If we cared about speed here then we would delete the DBG_BUGON() check because that's going to be expensive. The likely/unlikely annotations should be used in places a reasonable person thinks it will make a difference to benchmarks. regards, dan carpenter