From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: "zhengbin (A)" <zhengbin13@huawei.com>,
jack@suse.cz, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
"zhangyi (F)" <yi.zhang@huawei.com>,
renxudong1@huawei.com, Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
lkp@01.org
Subject: Re: 266a9a8b41: WARNING:possible_recursive_locking_detected
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 04:03:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190916030355.GZ1131@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190916025827.GY1131@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 03:58:27AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 10:04:34AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> > FYI, we noticed the following commit (built with gcc-7):
> >
> > commit: 266a9a8b41803281e192151ae99779a7d50fc391 ("[PATCH] Re: Possible FS race condition between iterate_dir and d_alloc_parallel")
> > url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Al-Viro/Re-Possible-FS-race-condition-between-iterate_dir-and-d_alloc_parallel/20190915-052109
> >
> >
> > in testcase: rcutorture
> > with following parameters:
> >
> > runtime: 300s
> > test: default
> > torture_type: srcu
> >
> > test-description: rcutorture is rcutorture kernel module load/unload test.
> > test-url: https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/RCU/torture.txt
> >
> >
> > on test machine: qemu-system-x86_64 -enable-kvm -cpu SandyBridge -smp 2 -m 4G
> >
> > caused below changes (please refer to attached dmesg/kmsg for entire log/backtrace):
>
> False positive; dget() on child while holding ->d_lock on parent is OK.
> We could turn that into explicit spin_lock_nested() on child + increment of
> ->d_count under that, but this is a pointless pessimization. Not sure
> what's the best way to tell lockdep to STFU here, but in this case it
> really ought to - locking order is correct.
Perhaps lockref_get_nested(struct lockref *lockref, unsigned int subclass)?
With s/spin_lock/spin_lock_nested/ in the body...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-16 3:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-03 14:44 Possible FS race condition between iterate_dir and d_alloc_parallel zhengbin (A)
2019-09-03 15:40 ` Al Viro
2019-09-03 15:41 ` Al Viro
2019-09-04 6:15 ` zhengbin (A)
2019-09-05 17:47 ` Al Viro
2019-09-06 0:55 ` Jun Li
2019-09-06 2:00 ` Al Viro
2019-09-06 2:32 ` zhengbin (A)
2019-09-09 14:10 ` zhengbin (A)
2019-09-09 14:59 ` Al Viro
2019-09-09 15:10 ` zhengbin (A)
[not found] ` <7e32cda5-dc89-719d-9651-cf2bd06ae728@huawei.com>
2019-09-10 21:53 ` Al Viro
2019-09-10 22:17 ` Al Viro
2019-09-14 16:16 ` [PATCH] " Al Viro
2019-09-14 16:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-09-14 17:01 ` Al Viro
2019-09-14 17:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-09-14 20:04 ` Al Viro
2019-09-14 22:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-09-15 0:50 ` Al Viro
2019-09-15 1:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-09-15 16:02 ` Al Viro
2019-09-15 17:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-09-21 14:07 ` Al Viro
2019-09-21 16:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-09-21 17:18 ` Al Viro
2019-09-21 17:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-09-24 2:52 ` Al Viro
2019-09-24 13:30 ` Josef Bacik
2019-09-24 14:51 ` Al Viro
2019-09-24 15:01 ` Josef Bacik
2019-09-24 15:11 ` Al Viro
2019-09-24 15:26 ` Josef Bacik
2019-09-24 16:33 ` Al Viro
[not found] ` <CAHk-=wiJ1eY7y6r_cFNRPCqD+BJZS7eJeQFO6OrXxRFjDAipsQ@mail.gmail.com>
2019-09-29 5:29 ` Al Viro
2019-09-25 11:59 ` Amir Goldstein
2019-09-25 12:22 ` Al Viro
2019-09-25 12:34 ` Amir Goldstein
2019-09-22 21:29 ` Al Viro
2019-09-23 3:32 ` zhengbin (A)
2019-09-23 5:08 ` Al Viro
[not found] ` <20190916020434.tutzwipgs4f6o3di@inn2.lkp.intel.com>
2019-09-16 2:58 ` 266a9a8b41: WARNING:possible_recursive_locking_detected Al Viro
2019-09-16 3:03 ` Al Viro [this message]
2019-09-16 3:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-09-16 17:16 ` Al Viro
2019-09-16 17:29 ` Al Viro
[not found] ` <bd707e64-9650-e9ed-a820-e2cabd02eaf8@huawei.com>
2019-09-17 12:01 ` Al Viro
2019-09-19 3:36 ` zhengbin (A)
2019-09-19 3:55 ` Al Viro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190916030355.GZ1131@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=houtao1@huawei.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@01.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=renxudong1@huawei.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
--cc=zhengbin13@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).