linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: hev <r@hev.cc>
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Heiher <r@hev.cc>, Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
	Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>,
	Eric Wong <e@80x24.org>, Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Roman Penyaev <rpenyaev@suse.de>,
	Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudrala@intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH RESEND v2] fs/epoll: Remove unnecessary wakeups of nested epoll that in ET mode
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2019 17:24:13 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190919092413.11141-1-r@hev.cc> (raw)

From: Heiher <r@hev.cc>

Take the case where we have:

        t0
         | (ew)
        e0
         | (et)
        e1
         | (lt)
        s0

t0: thread 0
e0: epoll fd 0
e1: epoll fd 1
s0: socket fd 0
ew: epoll_wait
et: edge-trigger
lt: level-trigger

When s0 fires an event, e1 catches the event, and then e0 catches an event from
e1. After this, There is a thread t0 do epoll_wait() many times on e0, it should
only get one event in total, because e1 is a dded to e0 in edge-triggered mode.

This patch only allows the wakeup(&ep->poll_wait) in ep_scan_ready_list under
two conditions:

 1. depth == 0.
 2. There have event is added to ep->ovflist during processing.

Test code:
 #include <unistd.h>
 #include <sys/epoll.h>
 #include <sys/socket.h>

 int main(int argc, char *argv[])
 {
 	int sfd[2];
 	int efd[2];
 	struct epoll_event e;

 	if (socketpair(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0, sfd) < 0)
 		goto out;

 	efd[0] = epoll_create(1);
 	if (efd[0] < 0)
 		goto out;

 	efd[1] = epoll_create(1);
 	if (efd[1] < 0)
 		goto out;

 	e.events = EPOLLIN;
 	if (epoll_ctl(efd[1], EPOLL_CTL_ADD, sfd[0], &e) < 0)
 		goto out;

 	e.events = EPOLLIN | EPOLLET;
 	if (epoll_ctl(efd[0], EPOLL_CTL_ADD, efd[1], &e) < 0)
 		goto out;

 	if (write(sfd[1], "w", 1) != 1)
 		goto out;

 	if (epoll_wait(efd[0], &e, 1, 0) != 1)
 		goto out;

 	if (epoll_wait(efd[0], &e, 1, 0) != 0)
 		goto out;

 	close(efd[0]);
 	close(efd[1]);
 	close(sfd[0]);
 	close(sfd[1]);

 	return 0;

 out:
 	return -1;
 }

More tests:
 https://github.com/heiher/epoll-wakeup

Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
Cc: Eric Wong <e@80x24.org>
Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Roman Penyaev <rpenyaev@suse.de>
Cc: Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudrala@intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: hev <r@hev.cc>
---
 fs/eventpoll.c | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/eventpoll.c b/fs/eventpoll.c
index c4159bcc05d9..fa71468dbd51 100644
--- a/fs/eventpoll.c
+++ b/fs/eventpoll.c
@@ -685,6 +685,9 @@ static __poll_t ep_scan_ready_list(struct eventpoll *ep,
 	if (!ep_locked)
 		mutex_lock_nested(&ep->mtx, depth);
 
+	if (!depth || list_empty_careful(&ep->rdllist))
+		pwake++;
+
 	/*
 	 * Steal the ready list, and re-init the original one to the
 	 * empty list. Also, set ep->ovflist to NULL so that events
@@ -755,7 +758,7 @@ static __poll_t ep_scan_ready_list(struct eventpoll *ep,
 		mutex_unlock(&ep->mtx);
 
 	/* We have to call this outside the lock */
-	if (pwake)
+	if (pwake == 2)
 		ep_poll_safewake(&ep->poll_wait);
 
 	return res;
-- 
2.23.0


             reply	other threads:[~2019-09-19  9:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-19  9:24 hev [this message]
2019-09-20 16:00 ` [PATCH RESEND v2] fs/epoll: Remove unnecessary wakeups of nested epoll that in ET mode Jason Baron
2019-09-23 15:33   ` Jason Baron
2019-09-24 14:06     ` Heiher
2019-09-24 15:18       ` Jason Baron
2019-09-25  1:55         ` Heiher

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190919092413.11141-1-r@hev.cc \
    --to=r@hev.cc \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
    --cc=e@80x24.org \
    --cc=jbaron@akamai.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
    --cc=rpenyaev@suse.de \
    --cc=sridhar.samudrala@intel.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).