linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
	Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>,
	LTP List <ltp@lists.linux.it>,
	Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, chrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Subject: Re: LTP: diotest4.c:476: read to read-only space. returns 0: Success
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 00:38:15 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191111083815.GA29540@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1751469294.11431533.1573460380206.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>

On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 03:19:40AM -0500, Jan Stancek wrote:
> > > loff_t length,
> > >                 if (pad)
> > >                         iomap_dio_zero(dio, iomap, pos, fs_block_size -
> > >                         pad);
> > >         }
> > > -       return copied ? copied : ret;
> > > +       return copied ? (loff_t) copied : ret;
> > 
> > I'm a little confused on this proposed fix -- why does casting size_t
> > (aka unsigned long) to loff_t (long long) on a 32-bit system change the
> > test outcome?
> 
> Ternary operator has a return type and an attempt is made to convert
> each of operands to the type of the other. So, in this case "ret"
> appears to be converted to type of "copied" first. Both have size of
> 4 bytes on 32-bit x86:

Sounds like we should use a good old if here to avoid that whole problem
spacE:

	if (copied)
		return copied;
	return ret;

> size_t copied = 0;
> int ret = -14;
> long long actor_ret = copied ? copied : ret;
> 
> On x86_64: actor_ret == -14;
> On x86   : actor_ret == 4294967282
> 
> > Does this same diotest4 failure happen with XFS?  I ask
> > because XFS has been using iomap for directio for ages.
> 
> Yes, it fails on XFS too.

Is this a new test?  If not why was this never reported?  Sounds like
we should add this test case to xfstests.

  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-11  8:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-07 13:59 LTP: diotest4.c:476: read to read-only space. returns 0: Success Naresh Kamboju
2019-11-08  0:20 ` Jan Stancek
2019-11-11  1:26   ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-11-11  8:19     ` Jan Stancek
2019-11-11  8:38       ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2019-11-11 10:28         ` [PATCH] iomap: fix return value of iomap_dio_bio_actor on 32bit systems Jan Stancek
2019-11-11 10:36           ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-11-12  1:24           ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-11-11 10:38         ` LTP: diotest4.c:476: read to read-only space. returns 0: Success Jan Stancek
2019-11-11 18:26           ` Naresh Kamboju

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191111083815.GA29540@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=chrubis@suse.cz \
    --cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=jstancek@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    --cc=naresh.kamboju@linaro.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).