From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/12] vfs: don't parse "posixacl" option
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 03:42:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191217034252.GT4203@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191128155940.17530-12-mszeredi@redhat.com>
On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 04:59:39PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> Unlike the others, this is _not_ a standard option accepted by mount(8).
>
> In fact SB_POSIXACL is an internal flag, and accepting MS_POSIXACL on the
> mount(2) interface is possibly a bug.
>
> The only filesystem that apparently wants to handle the "posixacl" option
> is 9p, but it has special handling of that option besides setting
> SB_POSIXACL.
Huh? For e.g. ceph having -o posixacl and -o acl are currently equivalent;
your patch would seem to break that, wouldn't it?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-17 3:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-28 15:59 [PATCH 00/12] various vfs patches Miklos Szeredi
2019-11-28 15:59 ` [PATCH 01/12] aio: fix async fsync creds Miklos Szeredi
2019-12-13 9:32 ` Miklos Szeredi
2020-05-04 8:05 ` Avi Kivity
2019-11-28 15:59 ` [PATCH 02/12] fs_parse: fix fs_param_v_optional handling Miklos Szeredi
2019-11-29 11:31 ` Andrew Price
2019-11-29 14:43 ` Miklos Szeredi
2019-11-29 15:56 ` Andrew Price
2019-12-16 23:28 ` Al Viro
2019-12-17 1:18 ` Al Viro
2019-12-17 3:27 ` Al Viro
2019-11-28 15:59 ` [PATCH 03/12] vfs: verify param type in vfs_parse_sb_flag() Miklos Szeredi
2019-11-28 15:59 ` [PATCH 04/12] uapi: deprecate STATX_ALL Miklos Szeredi
2019-11-28 15:59 ` [PATCH 05/12] statx: don't clear STATX_ATIME on SB_RDONLY Miklos Szeredi
2019-11-28 15:59 ` [PATCH 06/12] utimensat: AT_EMPTY_PATH support Miklos Szeredi
2019-11-28 15:59 ` [PATCH 07/12] f*xattr: allow O_PATH descriptors Miklos Szeredi
2019-11-28 15:59 ` [PATCH 08/12] vfs: allow unprivileged whiteout creation Miklos Szeredi
2019-12-17 3:51 ` Al Viro
2019-12-17 4:22 ` Miklos Szeredi
2019-11-28 15:59 ` [PATCH 09/12] fs_parser: "string" with missing value is a "flag" Miklos Szeredi
2019-12-17 17:32 ` Al Viro
2019-12-17 18:31 ` Al Viro
2019-11-28 15:59 ` [PATCH 10/12] vfs: don't parse forbidden flags Miklos Szeredi
2019-11-28 15:59 ` [PATCH 11/12] vfs: don't parse "posixacl" option Miklos Szeredi
2019-12-17 3:42 ` Al Viro [this message]
2019-12-17 4:18 ` Miklos Szeredi
2019-12-17 4:28 ` Al Viro
2019-11-28 15:59 ` [PATCH 12/12] vfs: don't parse "silent" option Miklos Szeredi
2019-12-17 3:37 ` Al Viro
2019-12-17 4:12 ` Miklos Szeredi
2019-12-17 4:16 ` Miklos Szeredi
2019-12-17 4:19 ` Al Viro
2019-12-17 4:23 ` Miklos Szeredi
2019-12-17 4:28 ` Miklos Szeredi
2019-12-17 4:17 ` Al Viro
2019-12-13 9:33 ` [PATCH 00/12] various vfs patches Miklos Szeredi
2019-12-16 23:13 ` Al Viro
2020-05-05 9:59 [PATCH 00/12] vfs patch queue Miklos Szeredi
2020-05-05 9:59 ` [PATCH 11/12] vfs: don't parse "posixacl" option Miklos Szeredi
2020-05-13 10:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191217034252.GT4203@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mszeredi@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).