From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABF8FC3F68F for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 05:44:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AB382071E for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 05:44:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727139AbfL3Foa (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Dec 2019 00:44:30 -0500 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:42590 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725834AbfL3Foa (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Dec 2019 00:44:30 -0500 Received: from viro by ZenIV.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ilnqf-0005Om-SW; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 05:44:14 +0000 Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 05:44:13 +0000 From: Al Viro To: Aleksa Sarai Cc: David Howells , Eric Biederman , Linus Torvalds , stable@vger.kernel.org, Christian Brauner , Serge Hallyn , dev@opencontainers.org, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/1] mount: universally disallow mounting over symlinks Message-ID: <20191230054413.GX4203@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20191230052036.8765-1-cyphar@cyphar.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191230052036.8765-1-cyphar@cyphar.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 04:20:35PM +1100, Aleksa Sarai wrote: > A reasonably detailed explanation of the issues is provided in the patch > itself, but the full traces produced by both the oopses and deadlocks is > included below (it makes little sense to include them in the commit since we > are disabling this feature, not directly fixing the bugs themselves). > > I've posted this as an RFC on whether this feature should be allowed at > all (and if anyone knows of legitimate uses for it), or if we should > work on fixing these other kernel bugs that it exposes. Umm... Are all of those traces a) reproducible on mainline and b) reproducible as the first oopsen? As it is, quite a few might be secondary results of earlier memory corruption...