From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B705C3F68F for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 06:48:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D1BE2467A for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 06:48:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729187AbgAOGsb (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jan 2020 01:48:31 -0500 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:49190 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729103AbgAOGsb (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jan 2020 01:48:31 -0500 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 7952D68AFE; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 07:48:27 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 07:48:27 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Waiman Long , Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Will Deacon , Andrew Morton , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, cluster-devel@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/12] ext4: hold i_rwsem until AIO completes Message-ID: <20200115064827.GA21176@lst.de> References: <20200114161225.309792-1-hch@lst.de> <20200114161225.309792-9-hch@lst.de> <20200114215023.GH140865@mit.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200114215023.GH140865@mit.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 04:50:23PM -0500, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote: > I note that you've dropped the inode_dio_wait() in ext4's ZERO_RANGE, > COLLAPSE_RANGE, INSERT_RANGE, etc. We had added these to avoid > problems when various fallocate operations which modify the inode's > logical->physical block mapping racing with direct I/O (both reads or > writes). > > I don't see a replacement protection in this patch series. How does > are file systems supported to protect against such races? By holding i_rwsem until the direct I/O operations are finished, and not just until they are sumbitted.