From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6691DC33CA1 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 07:46:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 448A22077C for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 07:46:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726148AbgATHqB (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jan 2020 02:46:01 -0500 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:44828 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725872AbgATHqB (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jan 2020 02:46:01 -0500 Received: from viro by ZenIV.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1itRl0-00Btkf-JV; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 07:45:58 +0000 Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 07:45:58 +0000 From: Al Viro To: OGAWA Hirofumi Cc: Pali =?iso-8859-1?Q?Roh=E1r?= , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, "Theodore Y. Ts'o" , Namjae Jeon , Gabriel Krisman Bertazi Subject: Re: vfat: Broken case-insensitive support for UTF-8 Message-ID: <20200120074558.GA8904@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20200119221455.bac7dc55g56q2l4r@pali> <87sgkan57p.fsf@mail.parknet.co.jp> <20200120073040.GZ8904@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200120073040.GZ8904@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 07:30:40AM +0000, Al Viro wrote: > > Yup, that bug is there as well, all right. Look: > #ifdef CONFIG_UNICODE > static int ext4_d_compare(const struct dentry *dentry, unsigned int len, > const char *str, const struct qstr *name) > { > struct qstr qstr = {.name = str, .len = len }; > struct inode *inode = dentry->d_parent->d_inode; > > if (!IS_CASEFOLDED(inode) || !EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_encoding) { > > Guess what happens if your (lockless) call of ->d_compare() runs > into the following sequence: > CPU1: ext4_d_compare() fetches ->d_parent > CPU1: takes a hardware interrupt > CPU2: dentry gets evicted by memory pressure; so is its parent, since > it was the only thing that used to keep it pinned. Eviction of the parent > calls dentry_unlink_inode() on the parent, which zeroes its ->d_inode. > CPU1: comes back > CPU1: fetches parent's ->d_inode and gets NULL > CPU1: oopses on null pointer dereference. > > It's not impossible to hit. Note that e.g. vfat_cmpi() is not vulnerable > to that problem - ->d_sb is stable and both the superblock and ->nls_io > freeing is RCU-delayed. > > I hadn't checked ->d_compare() instances for a while; somebody needs to > do that again, by the look of it. The above definitely is broken; > no idea how many other instaces had grown such bugs... f2fs one also has the same bug. Anyway, I'm going down right now, will check the rest tomorrow morning...