From: "hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>,
Trond Myklebust <trondmy@hammerspace.com>,
"dhowells@redhat.com" <dhowells@redhat.com>,
"lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org>, "hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>,
"miklos@szeredi.hu" <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] Allowing linkat() to replace the destination
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2020 06:29:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200131052956.GA17457@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200131052454.GA6868@magnolia>
On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 09:24:54PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> Or the grumpy maintainer who will have to digest all of this.
>
> Can we update the documentation to admit that many people will probably
> want to use this (and rename) as atomic swap operations?
>
> "The filesystem will commit the data and metadata of all files and
> directories involved in the link operation to stable storage before the
> call returns."
That sounds horrible, because it is so different from any other metadata
operation. Maybe requiring fsync to stabilize metadata ops wasn't the
best idea ever, but having some varinats of linkat behave from others
is just stupid. We've been beating the fact that you shall fsync into
peoples heads for years. No reason to make an exception for an obscure
operation now.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-31 5:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-17 12:49 [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] Allowing linkat() to replace the destination David Howells
2020-01-17 14:33 ` Trond Myklebust
2020-01-17 15:46 ` Al Viro
2020-01-17 16:12 ` Trond Myklebust
2020-01-17 16:48 ` Al Viro
2020-01-17 16:36 ` Omar Sandoval
2020-01-17 16:59 ` Al Viro
2020-01-17 17:28 ` Omar Sandoval
2020-01-17 18:17 ` Al Viro
2020-01-17 20:22 ` Omar Sandoval
2020-01-17 22:22 ` Al Viro
2020-01-17 23:54 ` Omar Sandoval
2020-01-18 0:47 ` Al Viro
2020-01-18 1:17 ` Omar Sandoval
2020-01-18 2:20 ` Al Viro
2020-01-21 23:05 ` Omar Sandoval
2020-01-22 6:57 ` Amir Goldstein
2020-01-22 22:10 ` Omar Sandoval
2020-01-23 3:47 ` Al Viro
2020-01-23 7:16 ` Dave Chinner
2020-01-23 7:47 ` Amir Goldstein
2020-01-24 21:25 ` Dave Chinner
2020-01-31 5:24 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-31 5:29 ` hch [this message]
2020-01-31 7:00 ` Amir Goldstein
2020-01-31 20:33 ` Omar Sandoval
2020-01-31 21:55 ` Amir Goldstein
2020-01-28 1:27 ` Omar Sandoval
2020-01-28 14:35 ` David Howells
2020-01-31 5:31 ` hch
2020-01-31 8:04 ` David Howells
2020-01-31 8:56 ` Amir Goldstein
2020-01-22 9:53 ` David Howells
2020-01-17 14:47 ` David Howells
2020-01-17 14:56 ` Trond Myklebust
2020-01-17 16:01 ` Al Viro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200131052956.GA17457@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=osandov@osandov.com \
--cc=trondmy@hammerspace.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).