From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57212C35242 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 19:27:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 372242086A for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 19:27:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1581449227; bh=d9iTIU7z0h/UAxXemQIRG88N34pgT887tmSXs635Ibg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=PjbyzM5zUPaYY4riVm2cHnX2mpGzLXZX03uY5DucMyuV4hC408qpc1QcuazOceNWQ XaGExggWyGdgmN1PK/5SnPiXUsAShBYBf4HaZzR+8+pXbJUNmOCxxQI+OAOiAaKNiN OYqOxJn0r7+vINU0RG/OMBlVWv07/0AP6+WXXqsQ= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731573AbgBKT1D (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Feb 2020 14:27:03 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:38900 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729611AbgBKT1C (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Feb 2020 14:27:02 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [104.133.9.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5674C20873; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 19:27:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1581449222; bh=d9iTIU7z0h/UAxXemQIRG88N34pgT887tmSXs635Ibg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=BQY4MmpobVgaVaTP6qsCiIjySAMLzVQE3jZ/E5xMAk1pJ+Ut1QYPMb+tUrg73yxuB GP57yThJgV+rPR8Mpxl7iG7GB/bm5HksdTaptyuDfR1AydFmBQs8QgO6uEqvLly+VS W21zUBINJu/dqV0oI3gZqdmbZnG0pVVHo4lh7JYk= Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 11:27:01 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Pragat Pandya Cc: valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu, devel@driverdev.osuosl.or, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, skhan@linuxfoundation.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/18] staging: exfat: Rename function "ffsUmountVol" to "ffs_umount_vol" Message-ID: <20200211192701.GA1971434@kroah.com> References: <20200211123859.10429-1-pragat.pandya@gmail.com> <20200211123859.10429-2-pragat.pandya@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200211123859.10429-2-pragat.pandya@gmail.com> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 06:08:42PM +0530, Pragat Pandya wrote: > Fix checkpatch warning: Avoid CamelCase > Change all occurrences of function "ffsUmountVol" to "ffs_umount_vol" > in the source. I've said this before about this type of change, but there's no need for the "ffs" prefix at all for almost all of these functions. Can you just name them sanely instead? thanks, greg k-h