From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEB00C2BA83 for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 07:43:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B133206DB for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 07:43:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="pzmo+Nyf" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728380AbgBLHnT (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Feb 2020 02:43:19 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.133]:42254 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727669AbgBLHnT (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Feb 2020 02:43:19 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=i3FzU/6t3BUZQYdYKWKIP++waVhK3QKo6kpSCfJQFvg=; b=pzmo+Nyf5LhurqtfRObXcjN6/i 30JD94xN3M0+qt1rP80flGX/Md2ds9rmbNxwaBVV7MLc0S4DRwNS/Wn2iY8Tg1qs/aHtczJEdGKpg 2ck6k5Lrem7z3nme/5pWKJ1Uj95mbxSNqmBCf5kU1ebyIZl66IDfJj+yrsdviQI1o6xINTWOi+bz/ i3fgDk8fsNnzakvbTENrz6r6YxhUScL9FbYbVMFc/GHD/sAnOFO7tKSfCtc/VyOh/V6vkkPZWJ5pl xpNtbqbTM3YuBYafebNA32b7oNP3azQOpNB/VM2lfcDDT4YVv151hmIO2gDK2rJKneWcAT+kGOCTc BQe7Kcsw==; Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1j1mg2-0000Aw-Ux; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 07:43:18 +0000 Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 23:43:18 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/25] fs: Add a filesystem flag for large pages Message-ID: <20200212074318.GG7068@infradead.org> References: <20200212041845.25879-1-willy@infradead.org> <20200212041845.25879-10-willy@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200212041845.25879-10-willy@infradead.org> X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 08:18:29PM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > From: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" > > The page cache needs to know whether the filesystem supports pages > > PAGE_SIZE. Does it make sense to set this flag on the file_system_type, which is rather broad scope, or a specific superblock or even inode? For some file systems we might require on-disk flags that aren't set for all instances.