From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
Cc: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>,
Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, libc-alpha@sourceware.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: XFS reports lchmod failure, but changes file system contents
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 20:27:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200212202724.GP23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200212201951.GC1663@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 03:19:51PM -0500, Rich Felker wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 09:17:41PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> > On Feb 12 2020, Florian Weimer wrote:
> >
> > > * Al Viro:
> > >
> > >> On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 08:15:08PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> | Further, I've found some inconsistent behavior with ext4: chmod on the
> > >>> | magic symlink fails with EOPNOTSUPP as in Florian's test, but fchmod
> > >>> | on the O_PATH fd succeeds and changes the symlink mode. This is with
> > >>> | 5.4. Cany anyone else confirm this? Is it a problem?
> > >>>
> > >>> It looks broken to me because fchmod (as an inode-changing operation)
> > >>> is not supposed to work on O_PATH descriptors.
> > >>
> > >> Why? O_PATH does have an associated inode just fine; where does
> > >> that "not supposed to" come from?
> > >
> > > It fails on most file systems right now. I thought that was expected.
> > > Other system calls (fsetxattr IIRC) do not work on O_PATH descriptors,
> > > either. I assumed that an O_PATH descriptor was not intending to
> > > confer that capability. Even openat fails.
> >
> > According to open(2), this is expected:
> >
> > O_PATH (since Linux 2.6.39)
> > Obtain a file descriptor that can be used for two purposes: to
> > indicate a location in the filesystem tree and to perform opera-
> > tions that act purely at the file descriptor level. The file
> > itself is not opened, and other file operations (e.g., read(2),
> > write(2), fchmod(2), fchown(2), fgetxattr(2), ioctl(2), mmap(2))
> > fail with the error EBADF.
>
> That text is outdated and should be corrected. Fixing fchmod fchown,
> fstat, etc. to operate on O_PATH file descriptors was a very
> intentional change in the kernel.
Wait. First of all, in the testcase it's chmod(2) applied to /proc/*/fd/*; that's
no different for O_PATH descriptors. Location in the tree *is* associated with
O_PATH fd; that's the only thing they exist for.
fchmod(2) will certainly fail for those, as it always had:
int ksys_fchmod(unsigned int fd, umode_t mode)
{
struct fd f = fdget(fd);
int err = -EBADF;
if (f.file) {
audit_file(f.file);
err = chmod_common(&f.file->f_path, mode);
fdput(f);
}
return err;
}
SYSCALL_DEFINE2(fchmod, unsigned int, fd, umode_t, mode)
{
return ksys_fchmod(fd, mode);
}
... and that fdget() will give you -EBADF. If you've managed to get
fchmod(2) the syscall to give you anything other than that, I want
to see details.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-12 20:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-12 11:48 XFS reports lchmod failure, but changes file system contents Florian Weimer
2020-02-12 12:15 ` Florian Weimer
2020-02-12 16:16 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-02-12 18:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-02-12 18:37 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-02-12 19:15 ` Florian Weimer
2020-02-12 19:51 ` Al Viro
2020-02-12 19:55 ` Rich Felker
2020-02-12 20:01 ` Florian Weimer
2020-02-12 20:17 ` Andreas Schwab
2020-02-12 20:19 ` Rich Felker
2020-02-12 20:26 ` Florian Weimer
2020-02-12 20:38 ` Rich Felker
2020-02-12 20:27 ` Al Viro [this message]
2020-02-12 20:36 ` Rich Felker
2020-02-12 20:18 ` Rich Felker
2020-02-12 20:38 ` Paul Eggert
2020-02-21 4:09 ` Aleksa Sarai
2020-02-21 5:02 ` Al Viro
2020-02-21 5:21 ` Aleksa Sarai
2020-02-12 18:50 ` Florian Weimer
2020-02-12 18:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200212202724.GP23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=dalias@libc.org \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=fw@deneb.enyo.de \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=schwab@linux-m68k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).