From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DAD1C3B187 for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 22:36:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 142AA21569 for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 22:36:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=oracle.com header.i=@oracle.com header.b="UP7DA0+D" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729186AbgBLWgT (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Feb 2020 17:36:19 -0500 Received: from userp2120.oracle.com ([156.151.31.85]:39444 "EHLO userp2120.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727947AbgBLWgT (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Feb 2020 17:36:19 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (userp2120.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp2120.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 01CMX9MJ158365; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 22:36:11 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=date : from : to : cc : subject : message-id : references : mime-version : content-type : in-reply-to; s=corp-2020-01-29; bh=VFeSDsgSBvkQAC4z/Epd6NqlaYojuS+u2gfW5E/QwC4=; b=UP7DA0+DBjoniEOZ2unVe/1twDOMAmw35AUqi1AeAigPOI7kxNDRIhOSGcETQYEngE1p qtQgzGiCiedHq185FHlc1VWXbZkvP0fj9fzTuYpDlTv23TfeiY29OFGu9byfet8vGQfi zdQqFrsgUDJvXSQeZPpAUTWxiMvaG0BCnzB/xDUS+9kJceM8YBGpx4a4Jqr6qkIxJVNn 2aa5BltylYYbAJOkhZ5r0WTZjMsbUCUOy0IezgK8XHPWpB3HRvz2fH5ZddDFC932cag5 XU16lYwR9JGKfsW83yBt510a8cx3Ai93V1AnG6itsUwKJ86xGAAOpN/epnDJ8CpGbK8f +w== Received: from aserp3030.oracle.com (aserp3030.oracle.com [141.146.126.71]) by userp2120.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2y2p3snvhb-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 12 Feb 2020 22:36:11 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (aserp3030.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp3030.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 01CMVjtS085470; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 22:36:10 GMT Received: from aserv0122.oracle.com (aserv0122.oracle.com [141.146.126.236]) by aserp3030.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2y4k7xh5d5-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 12 Feb 2020 22:36:10 +0000 Received: from abhmp0003.oracle.com (abhmp0003.oracle.com [141.146.116.9]) by aserv0122.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 01CMa9ia000619; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 22:36:09 GMT Received: from localhost (/10.159.151.237) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 14:36:08 -0800 Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 14:36:06 -0800 From: "Darrick J. Wong" To: Dan Williams Cc: Allison Collins , Eric Sandeen , Amir Goldstein , Dave Chinner , xfs , Eryu Guan , linux-fsdevel , lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [Lsf-pc] [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] FS Maintainers Don't Scale Message-ID: <20200212223606.GQ6874@magnolia> References: <20200131052520.GC6869@magnolia> <8983ceaa-1fda-f9cc-73c9-8764d010d3e2@oracle.com> <20200202214620.GA20628@dread.disaster.area> <20200212220600.GS6870@magnolia> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9529 signatures=668685 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxscore=0 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2001150001 definitions=main-2002120154 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9529 signatures=668685 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 priorityscore=1501 clxscore=1015 impostorscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2001150001 definitions=main-2002120154 Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 02:19:40PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote: > On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 2:07 PM Darrick J. Wong wrote: > [..] > > I've really really wanted to be able to tell people to just send a pull > > request for large series and skip all the email patch review stuff, but > > I'm well aware that will start a popular revolt. But maybe we can do > > both? Is it legit to ask that if you're sending more than a simple > > quickfix, to please push a branch somewhere so that I can just yank it > > down and have a look? I try to do that with every series that I send, I > > think Allison has been doing that, Christoph does it sometimes, etc. > > This is begging me to point out that Konstantin has automated this > with his get-lore-mbox tool [1]. As long as the submitter uses "git > format-patch --base..." then the tool can automate recreating a local > branch from a mail series. > > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/workflows/20200201030105.k6akvbjpmlpcuiky@chatter.i7.local/ Yes, I'm aware of the development of git-lore-mbox, but I'd rather just pull directly from a developer's git repo than create branches on my computer. I /already/ have my own script to extract patches and apply/paste/staple them onto a git tree, and xfsprogs already has scripts to automate porting of libxfs change from the kernel. My goal here is more to change the balance of who does what work a little bit back towards patch authors, than it is to spend less time putting together git trees. I mean, most of you already use git already anyway, right? :) --D