From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
"Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-xfs <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 00/12] Enable per-file/per-directory DAX operations V5
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2020 13:55:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200402205518.GF3952565@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200402085327.GA19109@lst.de>
On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 10:53:27AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 12:25:11PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > - Applications must call statx to discover the current S_DAX state.
> > >
> > > - There exists an advisory file inode flag FS_XFLAG_DAX that can be
> > > changed on files that have no blocks allocated to them. Changing
> > > this flag does not necessarily change the S_DAX state immediately
> > > but programs can query the S_DAX state via statx.
> >
> > I generally like the proposal but I think the fact that toggling
> > FS_XFLAG_DAX will not have immediate effect on S_DAX will cause quite some
> > confusion and ultimately bug reports. I'm thinking whether we could somehow
> > improve this... For example an ioctl that would try to make set inode flags
> > effective by evicting the inode (and returning EBUSY if the eviction is
> > impossible for some reason)?
>
> I'd just return an error for that case, don't play silly games like
> evicting the inode.
I think I agree with Christoph here. But I want to clarify. I was heading in
a direction of failing the ioctl completely. But we could have the flag change
with an appropriate error which could let the user know the change has been
delayed.
But I don't immediately see what error code is appropriate for such an
indication. Candidates I can envision:
EAGAIN
ERESTART
EUSERS
EINPROGRESS
None are perfect but I'm leaning toward EINPROGRESS.
Ira
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-02 20:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-27 5:24 [PATCH V5 00/12] Enable per-file/per-directory DAX operations V5 ira.weiny
2020-02-27 5:24 ` [PATCH V5 01/12] fs/xfs: Remove unnecessary initialization of i_rwsem ira.weiny
2020-02-27 17:25 ` Ira Weiny
2020-02-27 5:24 ` [PATCH V5 02/12] fs: Remove unneeded IS_DAX() check ira.weiny
2020-02-27 5:24 ` [PATCH V5 03/12] fs/stat: Define DAX statx attribute ira.weiny
2020-02-27 5:24 ` [PATCH V5 04/12] fs/xfs: Isolate the physical DAX flag from enabled ira.weiny
2020-02-27 5:24 ` [PATCH V5 05/12] fs/xfs: Create function xfs_inode_enable_dax() ira.weiny
2020-03-01 22:37 ` Dave Chinner
2020-02-27 5:24 ` [PATCH V5 06/12] fs: Add locking for a dynamic address space operations state ira.weiny
2020-03-02 1:26 ` Dave Chinner
2020-03-02 1:36 ` Dave Chinner
2020-02-27 5:24 ` [PATCH V5 07/12] fs: Prevent DAX state change if file is mmap'ed ira.weiny
2020-02-27 5:24 ` [PATCH V5 08/12] fs/xfs: Hold off aops users while changing DAX state ira.weiny
2020-02-27 5:24 ` [PATCH V5 09/12] fs/xfs: Clean up locking in dax invalidate ira.weiny
2020-02-27 5:24 ` [PATCH V5 10/12] fs/xfs: Allow toggle of effective DAX flag ira.weiny
2020-02-27 5:24 ` [PATCH V5 11/12] fs/xfs: Remove xfs_diflags_to_linux() ira.weiny
2020-02-27 5:24 ` [PATCH V5 12/12] Documentation/dax: Update Usage section ira.weiny
2020-03-05 15:51 ` [PATCH V5 00/12] Enable per-file/per-directory DAX operations V5 Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-09 17:04 ` Ira Weiny
2020-03-11 3:36 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-03-11 6:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-11 17:07 ` Dan Williams
2020-03-16 9:52 ` Jan Kara
2020-03-16 9:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-01 4:00 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-04-01 10:25 ` Jan Kara
2020-04-02 8:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-02 20:55 ` Ira Weiny [this message]
2020-04-03 7:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-03 15:48 ` Ira Weiny
2020-04-03 17:03 ` Jan Kara
2020-04-03 18:18 ` Ira Weiny
2020-04-03 18:21 ` Ira Weiny
2020-04-03 18:37 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-04-05 6:19 ` Ira Weiny
2020-04-06 10:00 ` Jan Kara
2020-04-03 18:29 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-04-03 16:05 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-04-03 4:39 ` Ira Weiny
2020-03-11 6:39 ` Dave Chinner
2020-03-11 6:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-11 17:07 ` Dan Williams
2020-03-12 0:49 ` Dave Chinner
2020-03-12 3:00 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-03-12 7:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200402205518.GF3952565@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com \
--to=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).