From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F6A3C43331 for ; Fri, 3 Apr 2020 01:02:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D859D20675 for ; Fri, 3 Apr 2020 01:02:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="d0Qb5UHn" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2390186AbgDCBCm (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Apr 2020 21:02:42 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-2.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.81]:20734 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731842AbgDCBCm (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Apr 2020 21:02:42 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1585875761; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=bO3hj+XmbvjHKiWwQG5/9JyKi4fYtwG5ksjHsl3Ubkw=; b=d0Qb5UHnBuHDm59bEJ4IYZO10oRe5vLFz65KKfURM0bpury6AZDsiK/MWdHXUkSPgyIqWR S+73AE8r6eTIJts0jr9y2k2hl13a8GbbYGJoSZ6Ak1k36wUlv/Gdm+hBRpLv/kC3qgQhaR 6hcECErkOjiTXn1rQFbK/Sk4McvkjVM= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-507-tU0DVqRKPReeeNCAHzbbSQ-1; Thu, 02 Apr 2020 21:02:37 -0400 X-MC-Unique: tU0DVqRKPReeeNCAHzbbSQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF3998017CE; Fri, 3 Apr 2020 01:02:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.18.25.174]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 124255D9CA; Fri, 3 Apr 2020 01:02:33 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2020 21:02:32 -0400 From: Mike Snitzer To: Dan Williams Cc: Vivek Goyal , linux-fsdevel , linux-nvdimm , Christoph Hellwig , david , jmoyer , device-mapper development Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/6] dm,dax: Add dax zero_page_range operation Message-ID: <20200403010231.GA4475@redhat.com> References: <20200228163456.1587-1-vgoyal@redhat.com> <20200228163456.1587-5-vgoyal@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 31 2020 at 3:34pm -0400, Dan Williams wrote: > [ Add Mike ] > > On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 8:35 AM Vivek Goyal wrote: > > > > This patch adds support for dax zero_page_range operation to dm targets. > > Mike, > > Sorry, I should have pinged you earlier, but could you take a look at > this patch and ack it if it looks ok to go through the nvdimm tree > with the rest of the series? Yes, looks fine to me. Acked-by: Mike Snitzer